In his book None Dare Call It Conspiracy, Gary Allen wrote, “If you wish to establish national monopolies, you must control national governments. If you wish to establish international monopolies or cartels, you must control a world government.” ( http://www.biblebelievers.org.au/nonedare.htm )
The Council on Foreign Relations has been successful in taking over and controlling the government of the USA. The Council on Foreign Relations and the Royal Institute of International Affairs tried to establish the League of Nations after WWI as a way to a New World Order and world government. Americans refused to go along, they didn’t want to have foreign governments deciding when Americans had to go to war, and the League of Nations failed. The CFR and RIIA were successful in establishing the UN and at the same time took over the US State Department. ( http://www.bilderberg.org/roundtable/emhist.html ) The CFR is changing their verbiage. Instead of a New World Order, International Regime, or World Government the new words are “Global Governance.” The article that follows is about the CFR “Global Governance Conference held on May 1st 2010. Key speakers were Bilderberg Member Jean Claude Trichet and CFR member Robert E. Rubin. Once these secret cabals are successful in establishing their New World Order they can control international monopolies and will have successfully taken your freedom from you and your family. CFR, RIIA and Bilderberg members can be related directly to the economic meltdown and the destruction of over 40 Trillion dollars of wealth worldwide. Was this wealth really destroyed or was it transferred to members of these groups? Doesn’t that concern you? Shouldn’t you contact your legislators and voice your concerns? http://publicintelligence.net/council-on-foreign-relations-holds-global-governance-today-conference/ Council on Foreign Relations Holds “Global Governance Today” Conference 1 May 2010 One Comment >From the Council on Foreign Relations: Speaker: Jean-Claude Trichet, President, European Central Bank, Bilderberg Member Presider: Robert E. Rubin, Co-chairman, Council on Foreign Relations; Former U.S. Secretary of the Treasury April 26, 2010 General Meeting: C. Peter McColough Series on International Economics: Global Governance Today This meeting was part of the C. Peter McColough Series on International Economics. Jean-Claude Trichet, president of the European Central Bank, emphasized the need for global coordination of financial regulation in an April 26 address at the Council on Foreign Relations. Trichet argued for unified international accounting and capital standards for banks, as well as more say for industrializing countries in structuring global financial markets. Emerging-market economies have become “a source of strength for the world economy,” he said, and the economic crisis has “led to a clear recognition of their increased economic importance and to their full integration into the institutions of global governance.” Trichet declined to comment about ongoing negotiations over the IMF-EU joint bailout for Greece and said he was “confident that they will be concluded soon and rightly.” In comparing European and U.S. views on financial reform, he said the biggest disparities included the greater influence of investment banks in U.S. policymaking and vastly different accounting practices between European and U.S. companies. “We need accounting rules that will be the same on both sides of the Atlantic,” he said. The meeting highlights below feature former U.S. Treasury secretary and CFR co-chair Robert Rubin, the moderator of Trichet’s discussion with CFR members. Highlights of the Conference Transcript Excerpts I think one of the most important features of the present world is that we had an historical change of global governance, an historical change which had been prepared when you were yourself the head of this very important administration in the United States, with the creation, in the occasion of the Asian crisis, of the G-20, which was not the prime grouping for global governance, but was a very important grouping, obviously, particularly for the working out of standards and codes and rules and regulations. But the prime grouping for global governance was, at the time, the G-7. So the core, if I may, of the industrialized world in terms of dimension was clearly the heart of global governance, at least in its dimension, which is the informal grouping. And I see there France that — we are the heart of the preparation of this global governance in various G-7 at the level of heads. All that being said, we have now shifted the battle. The battle is not now in the hands of the industrialized world. The battle is in the hands of a grouping of countries which comprise the industrialized core countries and the emerging economies. And one of the indivisible events which was in the succession of events in Washington last days was that there was no G-7 communique and there was no G-7 briefing. The communique and the briefings were the G-20. So again, this is at the level of global governance, something which I trust is of utmost importance. And I would say that we owe this transformation — which, again, has been prepared; it is something which didn’t come as a shock and, I would say, unexpected event, because the G-20 existed already. But this shift from the G-7 to the G-20, we (owe it ?), it seems to me, obviously, because it was overdue that these economies that were obviously systemic at the global level would have a full ownership of this global governance at the level of this informal grouping that I mentioned. And that’s of course something which appears absolutely obvious. I trust also that there is a second reason. Perhaps the industrialized country proved that they were quite clumsy themselves in running their own economy, which were — and remain, of course, at the core of global finance and of the global economy, and that is something that we have to take fully into account. And it’s — (inaudible) — upon the industrialized country to be themselves fully conscious of the fact that they have their full role to play in the G-20 because they remain fully responsible for a large part of the core of global finance and of the global economy. … Let me say a word on something which has happened also quite invisibly, but in front of eminent central bankers. I cannot help mentioning also that in the cooperation between central banks we had large, very large ownership — which has been prepared by the creation of the global economy meeting in Basel, by the full participation of a large number, a very large number of central banks in our discussions in the preparation, in the, I would say, orientations that we were giving to a number of committees that are not very visible but very important at a global level. But there also we had shifted the prime grouping for governance at the level of central banks. It is now another G-10 who is the prime grouping for governance of central banks. It is the global economy meeting which again comprehends a large group of central banks of the industrialized world and of the emerging countries. And this is something which, of course, is parallel to what has been done at the level of the ministers, and governors, and at the level of heads, and which is also illustrating to which extent, at the moment of these crises — which, again, in its quantity and quality, if I may, is so dramatic, is coinciding with a very, very important and dramatic change of global governance. -- Please consider seriously the reason why these elite institutions are not discussed in the mainstream press despite the immense financial and political power they wield? There are sick and evil occultists running the Western World. They are power mad lunatics like something from a kids cartoon with their fingers on the nuclear button! Armageddon is closer than you thought. Only God can save our souls from their clutches, at least that's my considered opinion - Tony You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PEPIS" group. Please feel free to forward it to anyone who might be interested particularly your political representatives, journalists and spiritual leaders/dudes. To post to this group, send email to pepis@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to pepis-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/pepis?hl=en
