US Senator CFR members Kerry & Leiberman’s Energy legislation promoted
as National Security issue

On MARCH 19, 2009 President Obama said, “"So we have a choice to
make.  We can remain one of the world's leading importers of foreign
oil, or we can make the investments that would allow us to become the
world's leading exporter of renewable energy.  We can let climate
change continue to go unchecked, or we can help stop it.  We can let
the jobs of tomorrow be created abroad, or we can create those jobs
right here in America and lay the foundation for lasting
prosperity." (http://www.whitehouse.gov/issues/energy-and-
environment/ )

The White House webpage on Energy and Environment says, “To take this
country in a new direction, the President is working with Congress to
pass comprehensive legislation to protect our nation from the serious
economic and strategic risks associated with our reliance on foreign
oil and the destabilizing effects of a changing climate.  Policies to
advance energy and climate security should promote economic recovery
efforts, accelerate job creation, and drive clean energy manufacturing
by…Investing in Clean Energy…Securing our Energy Future..and Closing
the Carbon Loophole and Cracking Down on Polluters” (http://
www.whitehouse.gov/issues/energy-and-environment/ )

In the West Point speech, Obama spoke of an “international order” that
“can resolve the challenges of our times.” It will be promoted through
four “pillars” of American action: renewed and expanded alliances;
strength abroad through strength at home, with an emphasis on
education, clean energy, technology, and innovation; support for
international development and a revitalized diplomatic corps; and
promotion of democracy and human rights. (http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/
Foreign-Policy/2010/0526/Obama-s-National-Security-Strategy-Is-I-m-not-
Bush-ending )

Obama’s strategy is to include climate change and energy as national
security issues. Obama is using climate change as a strategy to
destroy American sovereignty.

At a breakfast at the Christian Science monitor, Wednesday May 26th,
Council on Foreign Relations member Sen. John Kerry (D) of
Massachusetts said “A lot of it will be focused on terrorism and
religious extremism,” but the president’s attention to the broad
implications of energy challenges tells him that “in principle, this
[energy issue] will be emphasized within” the National Security
Strategy.

At the breakfast, Council on Foreign Relations member  Senator Kerry
promoted as “a national security priority” the new clean-energy
legislation he is sponsoring with Council on Foreign Relations member
Sen. Joseph Lieberman (I) of Connecticut.

Richard Haass is president of the Council on Foreign Relations. In his
article Sovereignty and globalization, February 17, 2006, CFR
president Haass says,

“As a result, new mechanisms are needed for regional and global
governance that include actors other than states. This is not to argue
that Microsoft, Amnesty International, or Goldman Sachs be given seats
in the United Nations General Assembly, but it does mean including
representatives of such organisations in regional and global
deliberations when they have the capacity to affect whether and how
regional and global challenges are met.

Moreover, states must be prepared to cede some sovereignty to world
bodies if the international system is to function.

This is already taking place in the trade realm. Governments agree to
accept the rulings of the World Trade Organisation because on balance
they benefit from an international trading order, even if a particular
decision requires that they alter a practice that is their sovereign
right to carry out.

Some governments are prepared to give up elements of sovereignty to
address the threat of global climate change. Under one such
arrangement, the Kyoto Protocol, which runs through 2012, signatories
agree to cap specific emissions. What is needed now is a successor
arrangement in which a larger number of governments, including the
United States, China and India, accept emission limits or adopt common
standards because they recognise that they would be worse off if no
country did.

All of this suggests that sovereignty must be redefined if states are
to cope with globalisation…”
(http://www.cfr.org/publication/9903/
sovereignty_and_globalisation.html )

It is not the President and Congress that are working to pass
legislation to advance energy and climate security it is the Council
on Foreign Relations members that have taken over the presidency and
congress that are behind this legislation and this rhetoric. The
Council on Foreign Relations run Federal Reserve and Treasury are
behind the economic collapse that has destroyed 40 trillion dollars of
wealth and lost 20% of the American workforce their jobs.

Bernanke and CFR member Geithner have devalued the dollar and say they
are doing this to increase exports and create jobs. They are very
careful not to say  where the jobs that will be created. The devalued
dollar is producing jobs for the international corporations whose
exports are increasing because of the devalued dollar and who are
laying off Americans and exporting their jobs to China, India, and
Central and South America where workers are paid less. HP announced
that it is laying off 9000 Americans but it is” increasing its global
workforce” by 6000. Notice that the verbiage is changing from
outsoucing to “increasing its global workforce.” It is the CFR members
who run these companies and sit on their BOD’s who will be CFR
president Haass representatives “in regional and global
deliberations.” What place do your elected officials have “in regional
and global deliberations?” What voice do you have “in regional and
global deliberations?” Doesn’t that make you angry?

People, are you willing to give up your country’s constitution, flag
and sovereignty to become part of a New World Order controlled by
members of the CFR/RIIA/Bilderberger members? Totalitarianism is a
political system  under the control of a single political person,
faction, or class, recognizes no limits to its authority and strives
to regulate every aspect of public and private life wherever feasible.
Wake up people you are losing your freedoms you are being fed
globalony. Global governance is nothing less than global
totalitarianism.

-- 
Please consider seriously the reason why these elite institutions are not 
discussed in the mainstream press despite the immense financial and political 
power they wield? 
There are sick and evil occultists running the Western World. They are power 
mad lunatics like something from a kids cartoon with their fingers on the 
nuclear button! Armageddon is closer than you thought. Only God can save our 
souls from their clutches, at least that's my considered opinion - Tony

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"PEPIS" group. Please feel free to forward it to anyone who might be interested 
particularly your political representatives, journalists and spiritual 
leaders/dudes.

To post to this group, send email to pepis@googlegroups.com

To unsubscribe from this group, send email to pepis-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/pepis?hl=en

Reply via email to