Council on Foreign Relations Secret Ops - Council on Foreign Relations
Expands Secret Actions in Mideast.

The INQUIRY was America's first Central Intelligence Agency. Supreme
Court Justice Felix Frankfurter, and Woodrow Wilson's close political
advisor and friend, Edward Mandel House, suggested the idea to Wilson.
House became the INQUIRY's first director, Walter Lippmann was House's
first recruit. The existence of the INQUIRY such a well kept secret,
that to this day hardly any Americans have heard of the INQUIRY or are
aware that it ever existed. Wilson paid for the INQUIRY from the
President's Fund for National Safety and Defense. He directed that it
not be housed in Washington. A remote room in the New York Public
Library was its first office. Later it moved to offices in the
American Geographical Society at West 155th Street and Broadway. James
T. Shotwell, a Columbia University historian and an early recruit came
up with the agency name the INQUIRY, which, he said, would be a "blind
to the general public, but would serve to identify it among the
initiated." Shotwell probably chose the name because the word History
is derived from the  Greek word meaning "a learning by inquiry."
Ironically the INQUIRY would use psychological warfare techniques to
warp history by stressing favorable and unfavorable truths and leaving
out facts completely to shape public opinion to support INQUIRY
goals.

The INQUIRY and its members wrote most of Woodrow Wilson's 14 points.
Many of the members of the INQUIRY and the US State department
delegates at the Paris Peace conference belonged to the American
branch of a secret society founded by the English imperialist Cecil
Rhodes. At the Paris Peace conference they traded off most of the 14
points to establish the League of Nations. After the conference they
attended a meeting at the Hotel Majestic and become the founding
fathers of the Council on Foreign Relations.
Council on Foreign Relations member  Edward M. House became the first
National Security Advisor. The National Security Advisor serves as the
chief adviser to the President of the United States on national
security issues. This person serves on the National Security Council
within the Executive Office of the President. The National Security
Advisor's office is located in the West Wing of the White House. He or
she is supported by a staff that produces research, briefings, and
intelligence for the NSA to review and present to the National
Security Council and the President of the United States.
The National Security Advisor is appointed by the President without
confirmation by the Senate. This is meant to make sure they are not
connected to the bureaucracies of the Departments of State and
Defense, and are therefore able to offer independent advice. Every
National Security Advisor since CFR member House has been a member of
the Council on Foreign Relations. The current office holder is retired
Marine Corps General James L. Jones, who assumed the duties of the
post when Barack Obama was sworn into office on January 20, 2009 as
President of the United States. General James L. Jones is a member of
the Council on Foreign Relations.

On September 12, 1939, the Council on Foreign Relations began to take
control of the Department of State. On that day Hamilton Fish
Armstrong, Editor of Foreign Affairs, and Walter H. Mallory, Executive
Director of the Council on Foreign Relations, paid a visit to the
State Department. The Council proposed forming groups of experts to
proceed with research in the general areas of Security, Armament,
Economic, Political, and Territorial problems. The State Department
accepted the proposal. The project (1939-1945) was called Council on
Foreign Relations War and Peace Studies. Hamilton Fish Armstrong was
Executive director.
In February 1941 the CFR officially became part of the State
Department. The Department of State established the Division of
Special Research. It was organized just like the Council on Foreign
Relations War and Peace Studies project. It was divided into Economic,
Political, Territorial, and Security Sections. The Research
Secretaries serving with the Council groups were hired by the State
Department to work in the new division. These men also were permitted
to continue serving as Research Secretaries to their respective
Council groups. Leo Pasvolsky was appointed Director of Research.

On September 12, 1939, the Council on Foreign Relations began to take
control of the Department of State. On that day Hamilton Fish
Armstrong, Editor of Foreign Affairs, and Walter H. Mallory, Executive
Director of the Council on Foreign Relations, paid a visit to the
State Department. The Council proposed forming groups of experts to
proceed with research in the general areas of Security, Armament,
Economic, Political, and Territorial problems. The State Department
accepted the proposal. The project (1939-1945) was called Council on
Foreign Relations War and Peace Studies. Hamilton Fish Armstrong was
Executive director.
In February 1941 the CFR officially became part of the State
Department. The Department of State established the Division of
Special Research. It was organized just like the Council on Foreign
Relations War and Peace Studies project. It was divided into Economic,
Political, Territorial, and Security Sections. The Research
Secretaries serving with the Council groups were hired by the State
Department to work in the new division. These men also were permitted
to continue serving as Research Secretaries to their respective
Council groups. Leo Pasvolsky was appointed Director of Research.

The State Department has been controlled by Council on Foreign
Relations members since its inceptions. The NSA and State Department
are closely connected through Council on Foreign Relations membership.

[Council on Foreign Relations member ]Gen. David Petraeus, commander
of U.S. forces in the Middle East and Central Asia, says he endorses
[Council on Foreign Relations member ] Gen. Stanley McChrystal's
strategy in Afghanistan.
The Afghan assessment is contained in a confidential report prepared
by the commander of U.S. and NATO forces in Afghanistan, a copy of
which was obtained by The Washington Post. The thrust of McChrystal's
assessment is that without more troops by next year the eight-year-old
conflict could result in failure.

Speaking at a conference of military and civilian counterinsurgency
experts, [Council on Foreign Relations member ] Petraeus said the
current multi-dimensional approach is the only way to fight terrorism
in Afghanistan, the Voice of America reported. He said Joint Chiefs of
Staff Chairman Adm. Mike Mullen also has endorsed [Council on Foreign
Relations member ] McChrystal's assessment, the report said.

"To counter terrorism, and I'm talking about terrorism writ large,
extremism, requires more than just your special mission unit
forces," [Council on Foreign Relations member ] Petraeus said. "It
really requires a whole of governments, counterinsurgency approach.
Many different government agencies, civil-military partnerships and,
again, a comprehensive approach to these problems is the answer."

The report quoted Pentagon spokesman Geoff Morrell as saying [Council
on Foreign Relations member ] McChrystal's troop request will be sent
to Defenses [Council on Foreign Relations member ] Secretary Robert
Gates this week, while a review by President Barack Obama and his
administration officials continues. Morrell said there may be changes
in the troop buildup if Obama decides to adjust his strategy.

Today Mark Mazzetti published an article titled U.S. Is Said to Expand
Secret Actions in Mideast in the NY Times. The article should be
titled Council on Foreign Relations Expands Secret Actions in Mideast.
The article follows updated to identify CFR members mentioned in the
article.


U.S. Is Said to Expand Secret Actions in Mideast
By MARK MAZZETTI
Published: May 24, 2010
WASHINGTON — The top American commander in the Middle East has ordered
a broad expansion of clandestine military activity in an effort to
disrupt militant groups or counter threats in Iran, Saudi Arabia,
Somalia and other countries in the region, according to defense
officials and military documents.

The secret directive, signed in September by [ Council on Foreign
Relations member ]Gen. David H. Petraeus, authorizes the sending of
American Special Operations troops to both friendly and hostile
nations in the Middle East, Central Asia and the Horn of Africa to
gather intelligence and build ties with local forces. Officials said
the order also permits reconnaissance that could pave the way for
possible military strikes in Iran if tensions over its nuclear
ambitions escalate.

While the Bush administration had approved some clandestine military
activities far from designated war zones, the new order is intended to
make such efforts more systematic and long term, officials said. Its
goals are to build networks that could “penetrate, disrupt, defeat or
destroy” Al Qaeda and other militant groups, as well as to “prepare
the environment” for future attacks by American or local military
forces, the document said. The order, however, does not appear to
authorize offensive strikes in any specific countries.
In broadening its secret activities, the United States military has
also sought in recent years to break its dependence on the Central
Intelligence Agency and other spy agencies for information in
countries without a significant American troop presence.
[ Council on Foreign Relations member ] General Petraeus’s order is
meant for small teams of American troops to fill intelligence gaps
about terror organizations and other threats in the Middle East and
beyond, especially emerging groups plotting attacks against the United
States.

But some Pentagon officials worry that the expanded role carries
risks. The authorized activities could strain relationships with
friendly governments like Saudi Arabia or Yemen — which might allow
the operations but be loath to acknowledge their cooperation — or
incite the anger of hostile nations like Iran and Syria. Many in the
military are also concerned that as American troops assume roles far
from traditional combat, they would be at risk of being treated as
spies if captured and denied the Geneva Convention protections
afforded military detainees.

The precise operations that the directive authorizes are unclear, and
what the military has done to follow through on the order is
uncertain. The document, a copy of which was viewed by The New York
Times, provides few details about continuing missions or intelligence-
gathering operations.

Several government officials who described the impetus for the order
would speak only on condition of anonymity because the document is
classified. Spokesmen for the White House and the Pentagon declined to
comment for this article. The Times, responding to concerns about
troop safety raised by an official at United States Central Command,
the military headquarters run by [ Council on Foreign Relations
member ] General Petraeus, withheld some details about how troops
could be deployed in certain countries.

The seven-page directive appears to authorize specific operations in
Iran, most likely to gather intelligence about the country’s nuclear
program or identify dissident groups that might be useful for a future
military offensive. The Obama administration insists that for the
moment, it is committed to penalizing Iran for its nuclear activities
only with diplomatic and economic sanctions. Nevertheless, the
Pentagon has to draw up detailed war plans to be prepared in advance,
in the event that President Obama ever authorizes a strike.

“The Defense Department can’t be caught flat-footed,” said one
Pentagon official with knowledge of [ Council on Foreign Relations
member ]General Petraeus’s order.
The directive, the Joint Unconventional Warfare Task Force Execute
Order, signed Sept. 30, may also have helped lay a foundation for the
surge of American military activity in Yemen that began three months
later.

Special Operations troops began working with Yemen’s military to try
to dismantle Al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula, an affiliate of Osama
bin Laden’s terror network based in Yemen. The Pentagon has also
carried out missile strikes from Navy ships into suspected militant
hideouts and plans to spend more than $155 million equipping Yemeni
troops with armored vehicles, helicopters and small arms.

Officials said that many top commanders, [ Council on Foreign
Relations member ] General Petraeus among them, have advocated an
expansive interpretation of the military’s role around the world,
arguing that troops need to operate beyond Iraq and Afghanistan to
better fight militant groups.

The order, which an official said was drafted in close coordination
with Adm. Eric T. Olson, the officer in charge of the United States
Special Operations Command, calls for clandestine activities that
“cannot or will not be accomplished” by conventional military
operations or “interagency activities,” a reference to American spy
agencies.
While the C.I.A. and the Pentagon have often been at odds over
expansion of clandestine military activity, most recently over
intelligence gathering by Pentagon contractors in Pakistan and
Afghanistan, there does not appear to have been a significant dispute
over the September order.

A spokesman for the C.I.A. declined to confirm the existence of
[ Council on Foreign Relations member ] General Petraeus’s order, but
said that the spy agency and the Pentagon had a “close relationship”
and generally coordinate operations in the field.
“There’s more than enough work to go around,” said the spokesman, Paul
Gimigliano. “The real key is coordination. That typically works well,
and if problems arise, they get settled.”
During the Bush administration, [ Council on Foreign Relations &
Bilderberg member ] Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld endorsed
clandestine military operations, arguing that Special Operations
troops could be as effective as traditional spies, if not more so.
Unlike covert actions undertaken by the C.I.A., such clandestine
activity does not require the president’s approval or regular reports
to Congress, although Pentagon officials have said that any
significant ventures are cleared through the National Security
Council. Special Operations troops have already been sent into a
number of countries to carry out reconnaissance missions, including
operations to gather intelligence about airstrips and bridges.
Some of , [ Council on Foreign Relations & Bilderberg member ] Mr.
Rumsfeld’s initiatives were controversial, and met with resistance by
some at the State Department and C.I.A. who saw the troops as a
backdoor attempt by the Pentagon to assert influence outside of war
zones. In 2004, one of the first groups sent overseas was pulled out
of Paraguay after killing a pistol-waving robber who had attacked them
as they stepped out of a taxi.
A Pentagon order that year gave the military authority for offensive
strikes in more than a dozen countries, and Special Operations troops
carried them out in Syria, Pakistan and Somalia.

In contrast, [ Council on Foreign Relations member ] General
Petraeus’s September order is focused on intelligence gathering — by
American troops, foreign businesspeople, academics or others — to
identify militants and provide “persistent situational awareness,”
while forging ties to local indigenous groups.
Thom Shanker and Eric Schmitt contributed reporting.

-- 
Please consider seriously the reason why these elite institutions are not 
discussed in the mainstream press despite the immense financial and political 
power they wield? 
There are sick and evil occultists running the Western World. They are power 
mad lunatics like something from a kids cartoon with their fingers on the 
nuclear button! Armageddon is closer than you thought. Only God can save our 
souls from their clutches, at least that's my considered opinion - Tony

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"PEPIS" group. Please feel free to forward it to anyone who might be interested 
particularly your political representatives, journalists and spiritual 
leaders/dudes.

To post to this group, send email to pepis@googlegroups.com

To unsubscribe from this group, send email to pepis-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/pepis?hl=en

Reply via email to