Prince Charles Openly Endorses Draconian New Population 'Study'
January 17, 2013
http://www.blacklistednews.com/Prince_Charles_Openly_Endorses_New_Draconian_Population_Study/23656/0/38/38/Y/M.html
ExplosiveReports.Com - January 16, 2013 - Jurriaan Maessen
http://explosivereports.com/2013/01/12/prince-charles-openly-endorses-draconian-conclusions-of-new-population-study/
New Population Study: “(…) provide all sexually
active human beings with modern contraception and
backup abortion. The degree to which those steps
would reduce fertility rates is controversial,
but they are a likely win-win for societies.”
Prince Charles has openly expressed support for a
recent population study by biologists Paul and
Anne Ehrlich, calling for drastic global efforts
to reduce fertility worldwide. On the official
website of the Prince of Wales, prince Charles
commended Paul and Anne Ehrlich’s latest
population study published in the Proceedings of
the Royal Society on January 8 of this year,
calling among other things for globally provided
“back-up abortions” to avert overpopulation catastrophe. The prince writes:
“We do, in fact, have all the tools, assets and
knowledge to avoid the collapse of which this
report warns, but only if we act decisively now.”
In their latest study entitled Can a collapse of
global civilization be avoided?, biologists Paul
R. Ehrlich and his wife repeat their decade-long
mantra, namely that global population growth is
certain to collapse civilization as a whole- and
only a concerted global effort to reduce
fertility may avert the feared catastrophe. The
report mentions that global population reduction
is a monumental task, but they add:
“Monumental, but not impossible if the political
will could be generated globally to give full
rights, education and opportunities to women, and
provide all sexually active human beings with
modern contraception and backup abortion. The
degree to which those steps would reduce
fertility rates is controversial, but they are a likely win-win for societies.”
These words contain some drastic and draconian
implications. In order to provide “back-up
abortions” to women on a global scale, a
worldwide population reduction strategy must be
outlined and then enforced by all nations of the
planet. The Ehrlichs concede that such a
worldwide effort would not go down well with nations opposing abortions:
“Obviously (…) there are huge cultural and
institutional barriers to establishing such
policies in some parts of the world. After all,
there is not a single nation where women are
truly treated as equal to men. Despite that, the
population driver should not be ignored simply
because limiting overconsumption can, at least in
theory, be achieved more rapidly. The
difficulties of changing demographic trajectories
mean that the problem should have been addressed
sooner, rather than later.”, the Ehrlichs write.
Responding to countless recent studies showing
that not overpopulation, but underpopulation
seems to be an increasing problem, especially in Europe, the Ehrlichs state:
“That halting population growth inevitably leads
to changes in age structure is no excuse for
bemoaning drops in fertility rates, as is common
in European government circles. Reduction of
population size in those over-consuming nations
is a very positive trend, and sensible planning
can deal with the problems of population aging.”
They also write that besides change in the
politics of demography, the educational system
should also join the effort in a “symmetrical”
manner, “moving towards sustainability and
enhancing equity (including redistribution).” The
scientific community must throw its weight behind
the effort, the Ehrlichs say, especially to
counter all religious counter-argumentation underlining the value of life:
“To our minds, the fundamental cure, reducing the
scale of the human enterprise (including the size
of the population) to keep its aggregate
consumption within the carrying capacity of
Earth, is obvious but too much neglected or
denied. There are great social and psychological
barriers in growthmanic cultures to even
considering it. This is especially true because
of the ‘endarkenment’—a rapidly growing movement
towards religious orthodoxies that reject
enlightenment values such as freedom of thought,
democracy, separation of church and state, and
basing beliefs and actions on empirical evidence.
They are manifest in dangerous trends such as
climate denial, failure to act on the loss of
biodiversity and opposition to condoms (for AIDS
control) as well as other forms of contraception.
If ever there was a time for evidence-based (as
opposed to faith-based) risk reduction strategies, it is now.”
Global population reduction and global
redistribution of wealth. These things can of
course only be accomplished through a concerted
global effort or, as the authors declare “an
unprecedented level of international cooperation.”:
“At the global level, the loose network of
agreements that now tie countries together,
developed in a relatively recent stage of
cultural evolution since modern nation states
appeared, is utterly inadequate to grapple with
the human predicament. Strengthening global
environmental governance and addressing the
related problem of avoiding failed statehood are
tasks humanity has so far refused to tackle
comprehensively even as cultural evolution in
technology has rendered the present international
system (as it has educational systems) obsolete.
Serious global environmental problems can only be
solved and a collapse avoided with an
unprecedented level of international cooperation.”
The two end this line of reasoning by
regurgitating the neo-Malthusian mantra- which
simultaneously harbors a veiled threat, namely:
“If people do not do that, nature will restructure civilization for us.”
After Prince Charles endorsed the conclusions of
their study, Paul Ehrlich twittered “I wish our
leaders were as far-sighted”, to which one of
Ehrlich’s followers responded “Suicide on a grand scale needs reconsidering.”
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qhz7ZEztU3Q
Comments such as these show that morality is
nowhere to be found in the vicinity of these
neo-Malthusian characters. The fact that Prince
Charles felt compelled to endorse the conclusions
of this report only reaffirms that his lineage is
still of the opinion that people are a scourge on
the earth, or as his father Prince Philip stated, a plague:
As current Bing professor of Population Studies
and President of the Center for Conservation
Biology at Stanford University, Paul Ehrlich is
living proof that old habits die hard- and
eugenic habits die even harder. After his famous
book The Population Bomb was published in 1968,
he has fallen somewhat in credibility for the
world kept on turning and mankind is apparently
still around, despite of all the doom predicted.
In 1969 Ehrlich predicted that ““smog disasters”
in 1973 might kill 200,000 people in New York and
Los Angeles” and “By 1985 enough millions will
have died to reduce the earth’s population to
some acceptable level, like 1.5 billion people”.
Nevertheless, despite Ehrlich’s prediction of the
total collapse of human society if the population
would continue to rise, after 40 years the man
still maintains his point, this time pointing to
“climate change” as the consequence of increased
human activity. During an interview in December 2009, Ehrlich stated:
“The population explosion will come to an end.
The only question is whether it will do so by
humanity balancing its interventions to decrease
death rates with interventions to decrease birth
rates, or whether the death rate will soar.”
In 2009, Ehrlich also expressed his desire to see
the global population fall below replacement:
“Until and unless we can humanely begin to shrink
the global population, following the lead of
over-consuming and over-populated European nations, the future seems grim.”
Humanely shrink the global population”, says
Ehrlich. He is wise enough to edit the word
“humanely” in if he is to avoid the same
indignation that befell his friend John Holdren,
who co-authored Ecoscience with him in 1977.
There is of course no humane way of shrinking the
global population. Only a planetary authority,
enforcing such a shrinkage, could get the job
done. And it is exactly such a planetary regime
Mr. Ehrlich called for, together with current
chief science advisor to President Obama.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ulkt4j-qooQ
In the following fragment, Paul Ehrlich advocates
the creation of a “global system” to create a
“behavioral change”. Ehrlich: “We don’t have any
international effort to say, you know, how are we
behaving. We have global problems, why don’t we
have a global system to fix it.”
--
+44 (0)7786 952037
Twitter: @TonyGosling http://twitter.com/tonygosling
http://groups.google.com/group/uk-911-truth
http://www.youtube.com/user/PublicEnquiry
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Diggers350/
http://www.reinvestigate911.org/
http://www.thisweek.org.uk/
http://www.911forum.org.uk/
http://groups.google.com/group/uk-911-truth
uk-911-truth+subscr...@googlegroups.com
"Capitalism is institutionalised bribery."
_________________
www.abolishwar.org.uk
www.globalresearch.ca
www.public-interest.co.uk
www.radio4all.net/index.php/series/Bristol+Broadband+Co-operative
www.facebook.com/media/set/?set=a.1407615751783.2051663.1274106225&l=90330c0ba5&type=1
<http://utangente.free.fr/2003/media2003.pdf>http://utangente.free.fr/2003/media2003.pdf
"The maintenance of secrets acts like a psychic
poison which alienates the possessor from the community" Carl Jung
<https://217.72.179.7/members/www.bilderberg.org/phpBB2/>https://217.72.179.7/members/www.bilderberg.org/phpBB2/
Fear not therefore: for there is nothing covered
that shall not be revealed; and nothing hid that
shall not be made known. What I tell you in
darkness, that speak ye in the light and what ye
hear in the ear, that preach ye upon the housetops. Matthew 10:26-27
Die Pride and Envie; Flesh, take the poor's advice.
Covetousnesse be gon: Come, Truth and Love arise.
Patience take the Crown; throw Anger out of dores:
Cast out Hypocrisie and Lust, which follows whores:
Then England sit in rest; Thy sorrows will have end;
Thy Sons will live in peace, and each will be a friend.
http://tinyurl.com/6ct7zh6
--
Please consider seriously the reason why these elite institutions are not discussed in the mainstream press despite the immense financial and political power they wield?
There are sick and evil occultists running the Western World. They are power mad lunatics like something from a kids cartoon with their fingers on the nuclear button! Armageddon is closer than you thought. Only God can save our souls from their clutches, at least that's my considered opinion - Tony
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"PEPIS" group. Please feel free to forward it to anyone who might be interested
particularly your political representatives, journalists and spiritual leaders/dudes.
To post to this group, send email to pepis@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to pepis-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/pepis?hl=en