*key role of the taboo BIS exposed again! *

*Was Montagu Norman a Nazi sympathiser? *
Until last month, a small portrait of Sir Montagu Norman hung in the 
Governor’s private meeting room beside his office at the Bank of England. 

Montagu Norman (pictured) was close friends with Hjalmar Schacht, Adolf 
Hitler's minister of economics and Reichsbank president 
By Philip Aldrick, Economics Editor - 4:50PM BST 31 Jul 2013 
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/bank-of-england/10214541/Was-Montagu-Norman-a-Nazi-sympathiser.html

Norman was Britain’s first modern central banker and Governor for a 
remarkable 24 years until 1944, amassing powers at Threadneedle Street that 
turned what was a cosy City institution into an arm of the state. 

But he was also an economic dinosaur, whose determination to put Britain 
back on the gold standard in 1925 destroyed industry and condemned Britain 
to a more severe recession than necessary. 

Adam Posen, a former Bank’s rate-setter, has said that when he could not 
decide which way to vote he would look at the giant portrait of Norman 
hanging in the Monetary Policy Committee’s meeting room and ask himself 
“What would Montagu do?”. Then do the opposite. 

So, Mark Carney’s decision to remove the heirloom shortly after taking over 
as Governor on July 1 was loaded with symbolic significance. What he could 
not have known, though, was that another – more damaging – gold scandal 
involving Norman was about to erupt. 

On Tuesday, in a newly digitally published history, the Bank revealed that 
it had helped the Nazis sell gold looted from Czechoslovakia in March 1939. 
The documents put Norman right at the heart of the decision, raising fresh 
questions about his suspected Nazi sympathies. 

According to the documents, the gold was being held in the Bank’s vaults on 
behalf of the Bank for International Settlements (BIS) – the central bank 
for central banks. On March 21 1939, BIS requested the Bank transfer £5.6m 
of gold – £735m in today’s prices – from “Number 2 Account to Number 17 
Account”. 

The Bank was “fairly sure” the transfer was from the National Bank of 
Czechoslovakia to Germany’s Reichsbank, the record states. But, regardless 
of its suspicions, the transfer was made that very same day. Over the 
following 10 days, the Reichsbank sold £4m of the gold, with the proceeds 
poured into Germany’s ongoing rearmament. 

There is little doubt the Bank was aware of the significance of its 
decision. The request came just days after Hitler had invaded 
Czechoslovakia, in direct breach of the Treaty of Munich of September 1938, 
when Germany was given the Sudetenland in exchange for peace. 

Moreover, the request came from the then BIS president, J W Beyen, a 
Dutchman. The Czech central bank, under threat from its new Nazi bosses, 
had instructed Beyen to make the transfer. The Netherlands at the time was 
feeling extremely vulnerable to invasion and desperately trying to 
demonstrate its neutrality, so Beyen was in no position to object. 

However, had it wanted, the Bank could have blocked – or at least delayed – 
the request. It had significant influence at BIS because its representative 
Sir Otto Niemeyer was chairman, a post that revolved between member 
countries. Yet, it took the French to suggest barring the transfer of the 
looted gold. 

According to the historical record, Norman told the Treasury on March 22 
that he had “received a telephone message from the Governor of the Bank of 
France proposing that they should urge their respective Treasuries to make 
joint protest to the President of the BIS against possible delivery of 
Czech assets to the Germans, and that they themselves should join in making 
a specific request to transfer no Czech assets pending the next meeting of 
the board”. 

Norman “declined” the request, taking the puritanical position that “it 
would be wrong and dangerous ... to attempt for political reasons to 
influence the decisions of the president of the BIS”. 

Contact with the French appears to have been made on the day both the BIS 
request and transfer were made, suggesting Norman green-lighted the deal 
personally. His defence was that BIS rules had to be followed no matter 
what, and he persisted with this absurd line even after war was declared on 
September 3. 

On September 4, he wrote to senior Treasury official Sir Richard Hopkins to 
warn that any deviation from the BIS rules “would offer hostile propaganda 
an excellent opportunity for criticism that, where it is in their interest, 
HM Government do not hesitate to disregard their international 
arrangements”. 

To make itself absolutely clear, the Treasury replied: “The Bank should not 
act upon an order of the BIS if it seems to the Bank to be likely that the 
order might benefit the enemy... The Bank should not act upon an order 
without consulting the Treasury... Neutrals are to be assured that, where 
the Treasury are satisfied as to ownership, orders by the BIS shown to be 
on behalf of neutrals will be authorised”. 

The documents reinforce the impression that Norman was an inflexible 
aparatchik, but also renew questions about his suspected Nazi sympathies. 
As outlined in Liaquat Ahmed’s Lords of Finance, Norman was close friends 
with Hjalmar Schacht, Hitler’s minister of economics and Reichsbank 
president. 

In January 1939, Norman went to Berlin to attend the christening of 
Schacht’s grandson, named Norman in his honour. Ahmed writes that Norman 
admired “Schacht, and during the early years of Nazi rule, even the 
achievements of Hitler – he is said to have told a Morgan partner that 
'Hitler and Schacht are the bulwarks of civilisation in Germany’.” 

Schacht later turned against Hitler and was sent to Dachau in 1944 for 
suspected involvement in the attempt on the Fuhrer’s life. But he played a 
vital role in restoring Germany’s fortunes under the Third Reich. 

Suspicions about Norman’s political leanings would be reinforced by his 
behaviour after the press got hold of the Czech gold scandal. By May 1939, 
it had become a major political issue and on May 26, the Chancellor of the 
time Sir John Simon, asked Norman if the Bank still had the Czech gold. 
Norman obfuscated. 

He “did not answer the question”, the record states. In fact, the Bank did 
have the gold. It never left the Bank’s vaults, but was simply moved from 
one account to another. Beyen later defended his transfer request in a 
chance encounter with the journalist who broke the story. Being remarkably 
disingenuous, Beyen claimed: “It is all technical. The gold never left 
London.” 

More controversially still, on June 1, amid the political outcry, Norman 
conducted a further gold transaction on behalf of the Reichsbank worth 
£860,000 – without official clearance. “This time, before acting, the Bank 
referred the matter to the Chancellor, who said that he would like the 
opinion of the law officers of the Crown,” the record says. 

“On the BIS enquiring, however, what was causing the delay and saying that 
inconvenience would be caused because of payments the next day, the Bank 
acted on the instructions without referring to the law officers.” Norman 
defended his actions by claiming the law officers later supported the 
decision. 

History has not been kind to Norman, whose dandyish eccentricities such as 
disappearing on long cruises under the pseudonym Professor Clarence Skinner 
during crises have not enhanced his reputation. On the other hand, Carney’s 
colleagues at the Bank of Canada, where he was Governor, say he is acutely 
aware of his place in history. 

Hanging in one of the BoC’s boardrooms are portraits of all former 
Governors and whenever Carney was lobbied by some vested interest, 
according to his special adviser Tim Hodgson, he would ask: “You’re 
comfortable with the next Governor looking up at my picture and saying you 
did that to me. That’s the standard by which I make decisions.” 

Norman, it appears, has not passed the Carney test.
_________________
www.actorsandartistsfor911truth.org 
www.mediafor911truth.org

-- 
-- 
Please consider seriously the reason why these elite institutions are not 
discussed in the mainstream press despite the immense financial and political 
power they wield? 
There are sick and evil occultists running the Western World. They are power 
mad lunatics like something from a kids cartoon with their fingers on the 
nuclear button! Armageddon is closer than you thought. Only God can save our 
souls from their clutches, at least that's my considered opinion - Tony

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"PEPIS" group. Please feel free to forward it to anyone who might be interested 
particularly your political representatives, journalists and spiritual 
leaders/dudes.

To post to this group, send email to pepis@googlegroups.com

To unsubscribe from this group, send email to pepis-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/pepis?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"PEPIS" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to pepis+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Reply via email to