Syrian refugees we created now being herded into Europe
http://www.911forum.org.uk/board/viewtopic.php?p=170716#170716
‘US Seek to Control the EU Elites via Refugee Crisis’
By Andrew Korybko - Global Research, September 17, 2015
FARS News and Oriental Review 1 September 2015
Region: Europe, Middle East & North Africa, USA
http://www.globalresearch.ca/us-seek-to-control-the-eu-elites-via-refugee-crisis/5476541
interview given by Andrew Korybko to the Iranian
FARS News agency on the origins of the Syrian
war, refugee crisis in the EU and the US interest
in making radicals infiltrate Europe.
What are the reasons for such humanitarian crisis
in ME countries including Syria/ Libya? Who /
what countries / what reasons or policies are behind reasons for such crisis?
The triggers for this crisis can be clearly
traced to the “Arab Spring” theater-wide Color
Revolutions and the US’ Wars on Libya and Syria
(one overt, the other covert). These offensives
have also seen the participation of the UK,
France, Turkey, and the Gulf Monarchies, and
there are a couple motivations behind why they
wanted to initiate their regime change operations.
The US, for its part, envisioned seeing a
transnational Muslim Brotherhood elite come to
power from Algeria to Syria, functioning as a
sort of Arab version of the Cold War
international communist party. By this it’s meant
that the group would have secret cells all over
the region, be dedicated to gaining power, and be
financed by a substantial international patron
(the US, Qatar, and Turkey in this case) that
would use it as a proxy controlling force.
As regards the Gulf Monarchies (including Qatar),
they wanted to get rid of President Assad and the
Friendship Pipeline he agreed to with Iran and
Iraq in order to sell their own gas directly to
the EU, while Turkey was expressing its new
aggressive ideology of Neo-Ottomanism. France and
the UK, for their part, simply wanted to reassert
their former colonial spheres of influence. The
overall lesson that can be learned is that
attempts by external powers to militantly tinker
with the inner workings of sovereign states will
inevitably lead to a humanitarian disaster, even
in places where it was initially least expected
(the refugee blowback in Europe, for example).
What are the main reasons that make people off
Syria or any other war torn country which suffer
the disastrous life to take the risk to Europe?
People leave their country when their homes are
being destroyed and they don’t feel safe anymore,
but it certainly helps if there is an anchor
community and/or family member(s) abroad that can
help assist with their lodging when they do
eventually flee. However, it must be stressed
that the vast majority of Syrian refugees are
internal ones, meaning that they left one part of
their country for another region but haven’t gone
abroad. This is very important because it shows
the patriotism of most of the Syrian population,
which still want to live in their homeland
despite the obvious danger to their lives. For
example, Latakia has absorbed many internal
refugees, and it’s done a pretty good job at
making sure that they live in dignity and with self-respect.
As for why the millions of others have left, it’s
hard to generalize, but part of the reason is the
material attractiveness abroad (such as the dream
of earning Euros), which in some way, is being
used to lure Syrians out of their state in order
to demographically weaken it. The advance
construction of refugee facilities in Turkey
prior to the War on Syria is a case in point, and
according to Ghassan and Intibah Kadi writing for
The Saker, Ankara has finally decided to allow
the refugees to leave the encampments that they
were forcibly detained in, thus manufacturing the
latest migrant wave for reasons that have yet to
be fully explained. Perhaps, as they suggest,
it’s to increase Turkey’s leverage vis-à-vis the
EU when it comes to ascension talks, but whatever
it is, it’s clear that the refugees are being
politicized, and in some cases, weaponized. Let’s
also not forget that these individuals have to
pay tremendous amounts of money to human
smugglers in order to sail to Greece, so the
assumption that they’re the most desperate of the
desperate simply isn’t true for the most part.
And, considering that they were stuck in Turkey’s
‘refugee camps’ for the past couple of years,
it’s questionable how they received the money,
or, one is tempted to think, could they have
brought so much money with them four and a half
years ago that they still had some left for when
the time to leave finally arrived?
It’s also curious that many of these individuals
are of moderately young age and are well-fit,
meaning that, as the Kadis also wrote, they could
be defending their homeland had they not fled.
Many of those that left were anti-government
individuals in the first place, so that may have
played a role in why they made their decision to
go abroad, perhaps right before the Syrian Arab
Army regained control of their neighborhood out
of fear that they could get in trouble for their
terrorist sympathies. It could also explain where
they received the money to make their overseas
journey, since it’s common knowledge that
anti-Syrian terrorists are active in these Turkish-based camps.
Responding to a question I had in an interview
with Macedonian journalist Slobodan Tomic last
month, I also observed how odd it was that many
of the refugees are men entering Europe without
their families, thereby postulating that some of
them could obviously have nefarious intentions.
That isn’t to say that most of them have these
thoughts or are guilty of any wrong, but that it
shouldn’t be blindly discounted by general
humanitarian rhetoric and good intentions on behalf of the recipient states.
What covert policies has the EU taken that lead
to the recent prohibition of accepting refugees?
Is the EU now united to accept refuges?
I don’t think the EU is united at all, let alone
in accepting refugees. Hungary, for example, is
building a border wall on the Serbian border to
stop them from entering its territory, while
Austria and Germany have the opposite approach
and are actively welcoming refugees into their
countries. The issue is very divisive no matter
which country is being talked about, since you
have the various governments’ guilt for creating
the crisis, yet you have the innocent citizenry
inside the EU states that of course have their
own legitimate concerns about this. It’s really
hard to rectify these differences, hence why the
topic is generating such an uproar and internal
political division. People don’t want to see
strangers suffering in the streets, but at the
same time, they’re hesitant about allowing
culturally dissimilar individuals into their
communities. There’s no panacea for this problem,
and no matter how it’s approached, it’s bound to
upset many people who think it’s not going far
enough (either in accepting or rejecting the refugees).
In a true sense, it’s turned into a Catch-22 for
the EU, one which only plays favorably to the US,
which is of course interested in ginning up as
much internal division as possible for its
political ends. This allows it to retain a close
degree of control over EU elites like Merkel,
whose power is dependent on the ‘democratic’
whims of an easily manipulated majority. With all
that is known about the NSA, it’s quite
conceivable to infer that the information gleaned
from millions of EU citizens has been fed into
the mouth of Big Data programs, from which
megatrend analyses are spewed out for the US’ political benefit.
The main advantage here is that the US
understands the political undercurrents of the EU
masses more than their respective national
governments do, which is a strategic
vulnerability that has been, is, and will be
exploited into the foreseeable future. Its
relevance to the refugee crisis is that it gives
the US the upper hand in steering ‘people’s
movements’ for or against this politically
mobilizing topic, all with the end intent of
exerting pressure on uncompliant national elites
by scaring them with the illusive specter of
Color Revolution destabilization (similar in
general form, but with lesser intensity and no such regime change ends).
Should the political measures follow humanity or mere national interests?
In order to address this question, one needs to
look at the two identities that the EU has – that
of a supranational political organization and as
a social/humanitarian project. It’s undoubtedly a
complex combination of the two, but the
importance lies in which of them is predominant
at the moment. If the EU identifies itself more
as a supranational political organization, then
it and its members will let their national
interests dictate their response to the refugee
crisis; likewise, if it sees itself more as a
social/humanitarian project, then it’ll follow
the liberal logic of allowing each and every
refugee to come into the bloc or their country.
Another issue is that there is no consensus
within the EU itself over which of the two
identities is most en vogue, hence why national
interests are obviously guiding Hungary’s border
fence-building decision, whereas liberalism
(including the economic kind) is behind Austria
and Germany’s decision to welcomingly invite
refugees into their countries (which also
satisfies an eventual cheap labor demand amidst
their rapidly greying populations, it must be noted).
Corpses of suffocated refugees found in a container in Austria.
How do you think can EU help refugees?
It’s really hard to say, since the refugees have
been transformed by the US into a political hot
potato, one which has the potential to be
strategically and demographically weaponized for
use against the EU’s interests. If they would
have just remained a humanitarian concern,
perhaps it would be easier to propose measures
that the EU could theoretically take, such as
allowing some of them to enter into the country
and eventually be assimilated. Ever since Turkey
‘opened up the floodgates’, so to speak, and
allowed many of the Syrian refugees in its
country to leave for Europe, one must keep in
mind how much this has overwhelmed the host
authorities, and how it obviously has certain
consequences on their ability to properly process the incoming masses.
Not only that, but such an unprecedented influx
of individuals into some of the smaller European
transit states such as Macedonia and Serbia has
the potential to stir domestic unrest, and this
is also not without concern in the destination
states as well, as has been seen by protests in
Germany, for example. Under such conditions, it’s
not realistic to propose a “come one, come all”
type of approach, no matter how morally right
that might sound at the moment. If some of the EU
members want to take in a certain number of
refugees, so be it, that’s their sovereign
choice, but given the numbers that are flowing
in, it’s impossible to accommodate all of them
adequately, but it’s just as equally impossible
to send them back to Turkey or Syria. As I
mentioned earlier, it’s a real Catch-22 dilemma for the EU.
Will such entering of masses to Europe rise the
risk to security levels by fear of entering
extremists who covertly blend with the innocent refugees?
Absolutely, there’s not a single doubt about it.
As I mentioned in a late-July interview with
Marija Kotovska, a Macedonian journalist based in Athens:
Hungary stated that at least 90,000 people have
illegally entered the country so far this year,
and that they expect a total of 300,000 by year’s
end. Most of them likely came from the southern
route, meaning that they passed through Macedonia
at some time or another. Taking into account an
extremely conservative estimate that 1% of them
could be terrorists, then that calculates to
nearly 1,000 terrorists so far (and up to 3,000
by the end of the year) coming into Macedonia for
an unspecified amount of time.
This calculation holds true for any country that
the refugees enter into, since even if 1% of them
are terrorists like I very conservatively
estimated, then the continent is in for a major
destabilization in the coming future.
Furthermore, there’s a reverse dynamic that could
be taken into play by some of the more
NATO-active states such as France. It’s no secret
that they and the US want to train as many
Syrians as possible for regime change
redeployment back into the country, and hundreds
of thousands of young, anti-government Syrians
marching into Europe makes for an excellent
recruiting market from their perspective. Some of
these ‘recruits’ might even be promised a future
life in Europe (with social benefits included) if
they agree to be trained and return back to fight
for a certain amount of time. What this in effect
does is transform the refugee crisis into a
circular problem, whereas it perpetuates the flow
of people outside of the state (thereby depriving
Syria of much-needed manpower in fighting its
anti-terrorist war) and simultaneously gives the
West more recruits to indefinitely prolong the
crisis and provoke a greater exodus.
Terrorism begets more terrorism, but it’s just
that for the West, these are ‘good terrorists’
until the moment they begin operating in Europe,
North America, the Arabian Peninsula, or Turkey.
At that point, they’re ‘bad terrorists’ and the
blame is manipulatively and falsely shifted to
President Assad, who these actors ridiculously
claim is behind the rise of terrorism in the
country. There couldn’t be a more false statement
made about Syria than that, since President Assad
is the vanguard leader of the world’s
anti-terrorist struggle, but nonetheless, it just
goes to show how politicized the refugee and
terrorist issues have become that the US and its
allies are exploiting them for self-interested and geopolitical gains.
When one plays with terrorists, they’re bound to
get hurt sooner or later, and that’s exactly
what’s going to happen with ISIL, the Fake Syrian
Army (FSA), and others using the refugee crisis
as a plausible cover to infiltrate into the heart
of Europe. As is always the case, any forthcoming
explosion of terrorism would only be in the US’
interests as it seeks to divide Europe and
concurrently justify its military occupation of the continent.
--
+44 (0)7786 952037
Twitter: @TonyGosling http://twitter.com/tonygosling
http://rt.com/op-edge/authors/tony-gosling/
http://groups.google.com/group/uk-911-truth
http://www.youtube.com/user/PublicEnquiry
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Diggers350/
http://cryptome.org/2014/06/video-report-axed-2.htm
http://www.reinvestigate911.org/
http://www.thisweek.org.uk/
http://www.911forum.org.uk/
http://groups.google.com/group/uk-911-truth
uk-911-truth+subscr...@googlegroups.com
"Capitalism is institutionalised bribery."
_________________
www.actorsandartistsfor911truth.org
www.mediafor911truth.org
www.pilotsfor911truth.org
www.mp911truth.org
www.ae911truth.org
www.rl911truth.org
www.stj911.org
www.l911t.com
www.v911t.org
www.abolishwar.org.uk
www.globalresearch.ca
www.public-interest.co.uk
www.radio4all.net/index.php/series/Bristol+Broadband+Co-operative
www.facebook.com/media/set/?set=a.1407615751783.2051663.1274106225&l=90330c0ba5&type=1
<http://utangente.free.fr/2003/media2003.pdf>http://utangente.free.fr/2003/media2003.pdf
"The maintenance of secrets acts like a psychic
poison which alienates the possessor from the community" Carl Jung
<https://217.72.179.7/members/www.bilderberg.org/phpBB2/>https://217.72.179.7/members/www.bilderberg.org/phpBB2/
Fear not therefore: for there is nothing covered
that shall not be revealed; and nothing hid that
shall not be made known. What I tell you in
darkness, that speak ye in the light and what ye
hear in the ear, that preach ye upon the housetops. Matthew 10:26-27
Die Pride and Envie; Flesh, take the poor's advice.
Covetousnesse be gon: Come, Truth and Love arise.
Patience take the Crown; throw Anger out of dores:
Cast out Hypocrisie and Lust, which follows whores:
Then England sit in rest; Thy sorrows will have end;
Thy Sons will live in peace, and each will be a friend.
http://tinyurl.com/6ct7zh6
--
--
Please consider seriously the reason why these elite institutions are not discussed in the mainstream press despite the immense financial and political power they wield?
There are sick and evil occultists running the Western World. They are power mad lunatics like something from a kids cartoon with their fingers on the nuclear button! Armageddon is closer than you thought. Only God can save our souls from their clutches, at least that's my considered opinion - Tony
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"PEPIS" group. Please feel free to forward it to anyone who might be interested
particularly your political representatives, journalists and spiritual leaders/dudes.
To post to this group, send email to pepis@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to pepis-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/pepis?hl=en
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PEPIS" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to pepis+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.