General Leonid Ivashov: The use of the term
“international terrorism” has the following goals:
http://www.voltairenet.org/article133909.html
- Hiding the real objectives of the forces
deployed all over the world in the struggle for dominance and control;
- Turning the people’s demands to a struggle of
undefined goals against an invisible enemy;
- Destroying basic international norms and
changing concepts such as: aggression, state
terror, dictatorship or movement of national liberation;
- Depriving peoples of their legitimate right to
fight against aggressions and to reject the work
of foreign intelligence services;
- Establishing the principle of renunciation to
national interests, transforming objectives in
the military field by giving priority to the war
on terror, violating the logic of military
alliances to the detriment of a joint defense and
to favor the anti-terrorist coalition;
- Solving economic problems through a tough
military rule using the war on terror as a pretext.
In order to fight in an efficient way against
international terrorism it is necessary to take the following steps:
- To confirm before the UN General Assembly the
principles of the UN Charter and international
law as principles that all states are obliged to respect;
- To create a geo-strategic organization (perhaps
inspired in the Cooperation Organization of
Shanghai comprised of Russia, China, Kazakhstan,
Uzbekistan, Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan) with a set
of values different to that of the Atlantists; to
design a strategy of development of states, a
system of international security, another
financial and economic model (which would mean
that the world would again rest on two pillars);
- To associate (under the United Nations) the
scientific elites in the design and promotion of
the philosophical concepts of the Human Being of the 21st Century.
- To organize the interaction of all religious
denominations in the world, on behalf of the
stability of humanity’s development, security and mutual support.
The terrorism dialectic and control of the public mind
http://www.911forum.org.uk/board/viewtopic.php?p=171854#171854
Sunday, 17 January 2016 14:52 Professor James Tracy
http://www.habilian.ir/en/201601172412/Articles/the-terrorism-dialectic-and-control-of-the-public-mind.html
For twelve years now the United States government
paradoxically employs terrorism to justify its
global “war on terror” before the domestic
population. This war without end is continually
rationalized through the government’s now routine
manufacture of
terrorism<http://www.habilian.ir/en/201601172412/Articles/the-terrorism-dialectic-and-control-of-the-public-mind.html#_edn1>[1]
to warrant both the surrender of civil liberties
at home and commitment toward unrelenting
terrorism throughout the Muslim world. This
contribution seeks to analyze and interpret the
US government’s material and propagandistic uses
of “terrorism” as a dialectical strategy for
furthering its foreign policies via domestic
control of personal thought and public opinion.
Media critic Edward S. Herman distinguishes
between minor, “retail” and “international,”
state, or “wholesale” terrorism, with “retail”
signifying exploits of independent,
non-governmental actors having specific political
grievances. These include the purported acts of
“Al Qaeda” against the West, or the Irish
Republican Army’s exploits against Britain.
“International” or “wholesale” terrorism involves
overt state-sponsored or supported military
maneuvers, such as Israel’s violent subjugation
of the Palestinian people, America’s military
takeover of Iraq, or NATO’s destruction of
Libya.<http://www.habilian.ir/en/201601172412/Articles/the-terrorism-dialectic-and-control-of-the-public-mind.html#_edn2>[2]
The Mujahedin-e Khalq would also fit the description of wholesale terrorism.
Unlike the scenario in Palestine, Iraq, or Iran,
where terrorist acts are explicitly conducted
against the civilian population, since the
mid-1990s in the United States the US
government’s technique of contrived retail
terrorism has become a prominent and anticipated
feature of American public life that legitimates
premeditated wars of aggression abroad. Western
corporate-controlled news media are the principal
conduits for publicizing retail and wholesale
terrorism alike. Their unquestioning, erroneous
or censorial transmission of such events
safeguards and perpetuates terrorism’s
dialectical control of the American public mind.
Manufactured, or “false flag” retail terrorism
might also be extended to acts of seemingly
random horror, such as the numerous mass
shootings in the US that have been inadequately
investigated and explained. If such events are
spontaneous and authentic one must question why
the inquiries into them are typically shrouded in
secrecy. These events serve to intimidate the
public, extend the notion that random violence is
ubiquitous, and thus subtly bolster the state’s
monopoly on violence and control.
Such events require certain cultural and
educational requisites to succeed. They are
witnessed by a public already preconditioned
through an array of popular television and filmic
narratives that almost uniformly humanize
European and American characters while
objectifying or denigrating non-Western
characters and cultures, a concern that was
addressed at some length years ago in the
MacBride Commission
Report.<http://www.habilian.ir/en/201601172412/Articles/the-terrorism-dialectic-and-control-of-the-public-mind.html#_edn3>[3]
Through such conditioning and a general obeisance
to official authority a majority of the American
public is predisposed to unquestioningly accept
acts of staged retail terrorism at face value
while remaining acquiescent or oblivious to the
wholesale terrorism overtly committed by its own government.
What has been deemed false flag retail terrorism
or events that pass as such has been reported in
US news outlets almost reflexively as genuine
acts of terror against the government and people.
9/11 is the most obvious example. Yet an
important precedent to the 9/11 events is the
1995 bombing of the Murrah Federal Building in
Oklahoma City that was blamed on a single “lone
wolf,” US Army employee Timothy McVeigh. A
multitude of credible evidence indicates that the
Federal Bureau of Investigation, the Bureau of
Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, and
perhaps other federal agencies had foreknowledge
of or partook in the building’s destruction and
presented McVeigh as a “patsy.” Early news
reportage explained the detection and removal of
undetonated ordnance in the structure. Yet
federal authorities swept in to Oklahoma City,
took the investigation out of the hands of local
authorities and, with the help of President Bill
Clinton and Attorney General Janet Reno steered
the emerging narrative away from that of a
government conspiracy or botched sting operation
and toward the preferred storyline of McVeigh
blowing up the building with a truck bomba feat that defies basic physics.
The evidence and array of eyewitness testimony
was so compelling that in 1996 the ABC news
program 20/20 was producing the second of two
special reports on the Oklahoma City bombing,
according to the news magazine’s
producer.<http://www.habilian.ir/en/201601172412/Articles/the-terrorism-dialectic-and-control-of-the-public-mind.html#_edn4>[4]
The Department of Justice interceded and
prevented its broadcast. Shortly thereafter, the
one Oklahoma City television station that
persisted in investigating the bombing, NBC
affiliate KFOR-TV News Channel 4, was purchased
by the New York Times Company; its station
manager responsible for the exposés summarily
terminated.<http://www.habilian.ir/en/201601172412/Articles/the-terrorism-dialectic-and-control-of-the-public-mind.html#_edn5>[5]
The federal government conducted an unreliable
trial with many loose ends where McVeigh and his
friend Terry Nichols were convicted of the
bombing. Yet the most comprehensive investigation
of the OKC bombing was conducted by Oklahoma City
residents who formed the Oklahoma Bombing
Investigation Committee (OKBIC) with the evidence
and opinions of various experts consulted all
pointing to the terror campaign as being an
inside job. Wholly ignored by corporate media,
this document has had little impact on the
official lone wolf narrative put forth in the
wake of the bombing, and consequently most
Americans maintain that McVeigh acted
independently.<http://www.habilian.ir/en/201601172412/Articles/the-terrorism-dialectic-and-control-of-the-public-mind.html#_edn6>[6]
OKC and 9/11 appear distinct given their unique
retail terrorist narratives. Yet as Oklahoma
State Representative and OKBIC founder Charles
Key observes, the Committee’s Final Report came
out shortly before the events of September 11, 2001.
As we put this report together, we had a lot of
media that was waiting for this report. They were
ready to give it some significant coverage. And
our report came back from the book publisher
about two weeks before 9/11, and one of the
things that we said and some others said during
that time frameas before and after 9/11that the
reason that we did this is because if you don’t
ask the questions and you don’t hold government
accountablein everything that it does, not just
bombings like this, but everythingthen you will
have the same mistakes happen again, and they
will get worse as time goes
on.<http://www.habilian.ir/en/201601172412/Articles/the-terrorism-dialectic-and-control-of-the-public-mind.html#_edn7>[7]
Considered in this way, the OKC bombing was an
important precursor to 9/11the proverbial canary
of terror in the coal mine of US public opinion
that sustains itself on propaganda maneuvers
alongside the credulity and blind faith of the
citizenry. Lacking substantive criticism from
major journalistic organs, the canary’s survival
suggests the architects of terror raise the ante.
As the censorship experienced following the OKC
bombing suggests, the intended effect of
deliberate retail terrorism in the public mind
cannot be achieved without the government and
corporate media acting symbiotically. This
notably extends to the prestige outlets that
serve the more affluent and educated social
stratum, such as the New York Times, the
Washington Post, or National Public Radio. Such
news media are indeed essential in imbuing the
authenticity of premeditated or staged terror
events. As platforms for official political and
bureaucratic voices, they instruct important
opinion leaders throughout the nation not only on
what and where of retail (and wholesale)
terrorism, but more importantly how such events
should be interpreted and understood.
The Boston Marathon bombing of April 15, 2013 is
a case in point. Here the New York Times and
Boston Globe, owned by the New York Times
Company, played pivotal roles in reporting what
strongly appears to have been a mass casualty
drill rather than the actual terrorist event
eventually blamed on the two Chechens. The
graphic account of the incident in the New York
Times’ front page of April 16, under the
headline, “BLASTS AT BOSTON MARATHON KILL 3 AND
INJURE 100” includes the testimony from an
ostensibly off-duty law enforcement official.
“These runners just finished and they don’t have
legs now,” said Roupen Bastajian, 35, a Rhode
Island state trooper and former Marine. “So many
of them. There are so many people without legs.
It’s all blood. There’s blood everywhere. You got
bones, fragments. It’s disgusting … We put
tourniquets on,” Mr. Bastajian said. “I tied at
least five, six legs with tourniquets” … Deidre
Hatfield, 27, was steps away from the finish line
when she heard a blast. She saw bodies flying out
into the street. She saw a couple of children who
appeared lifeless. She saw people without legs.
“When the bodies landed around me I thought: Am I
burning? Maybe I’m burning and I don’t feel it,”
Ms. Hatfield said … She looked inside a Starbucks
to her left, where she thought a blast might have
occurred. “What was so eerie, you looked in you
knew there had to be 100 people in there, but
there was no sign of
movement.”<http://www.habilian.ir/en/201601172412/Articles/the-terrorism-dialectic-and-control-of-the-public-mind.html#_edn8>[8]
Yet these descriptions of profuse carnage could
in no way be corroborated by the available
photographic and video evidence that later
emerged from the scene, wherein there are no lost
limbs or similarly serious injuries observable
that one would expect from a genuine improvised
explosive device. In addition, authorities
insisted the device was made from the powder
derived from consumer fireworkswhich cannot
produce the effects described. Close analysis of
still photographs of the immediate aftermath in
fact suggests the use of actors and props to
further simulate the semblance of a mass casualty
event.<http://www.habilian.ir/en/201601172412/Articles/the-terrorism-dialectic-and-control-of-the-public-mind.html#_edn9>[9]
Such observations are all but confirmed in the
repeated violation of emergency response
protocols in the wake of the Marathon
bombing.<http://www.habilian.ir/en/201601172412/Articles/the-terrorism-dialectic-and-control-of-the-public-mind.html#_edn10>[10]
So is it also indicated by the personnel involved
in the event. For example, Richard Serino, the
former head of Boston’s Emergency Medical
Services devised the elaborate mass casualty
terrorist drill around the Boston Marathon
titled, “A Tale of Two Cities and the Running of
a Planned Mass Casualty Event.” In the primary
document for the event Serino emphasizes “working
with the media” to make sure they “get the right
story.” In 2009, Serino was promoted by President
Obama to become Deputy Administrator of the
Federal Emergency Management Agency, and Mr.
Serino was spotted in several still photographs
of the Boston bombing aftermath apparently
directing police and emergency response
personnel.<http://www.habilian.ir/en/201601172412/Articles/the-terrorism-dialectic-and-control-of-the-public-mind.html#_edn11>[11]
As I have argued regarding the Sandy Hook school
massacre and Boston Marathon bombing, the events
were both likely “extreme reality capstone
events” where the Department of Homeland Security
oversees and directs federal, state, and local
law enforcement and emergency response agencies
around a mass casualty or natural disaster
drill.<http://www.habilian.ir/en/201601172412/Articles/the-terrorism-dialectic-and-control-of-the-public-mind.html#_edn12>[12]
In order to ensure that the exercise is as close
to reality as possible, federal authorities
contract “crisis actors” to play victims and even
assailants in “live shooter” drills. Participants
from police to ambulance drivers and medical
personnel are required to respond, act and speak
as they would during a real event, which
potentially includes interactions with
journalists. The frequent inability of physicians
to provide thorough expert descriptions of their
patients’ injuries at both Sandy Hook and Boston
further suggests the probability of mass casualty
drills presented by news media as real events.
While the US government and media are involved in
the manufacture of retail terrorism spectacles,
the wholesale terrorism carried out by the United
States, Israel, and NATO is largely either
excluded from the public or presented in such a
way as to make it appear justified vis-à-vis
retail terrorism. The wholesale terrorism
committed against Afghanistan and Iraq was
legitimated in the American public mind by the
synthetic retail terror of 9/11. The alleged
perpetrators of such retail terrorism, Al Qaeda,
are presented as a symbolic construct of US
intelligence and news media used to continue the
“war on terror” and justify the loss of civil
liberties. The typical punishment for questioning
such artificial reality is being labeled a
“conspiracy theorist,” which in fact denotes an
unacceptable questioning of government policies
provided for under our Constitution.
The Al Qaeda bogey is still shamelessly trotted
out before the public as the US carries out drone
aerial warfare on civilian populations and its
allies recruit genuinely ruthless criminals en
masse and unleash them on Libya and Syria. The
wholesale terrorism committed by the US, NATO,
and the mercenary forces operating under their
direction against Libya was conducted under
Obama’s alleged humanitarian zeal and nearly
formalized “responsibility to protect”
policy. The actual bloodbath on the ground was
whitewashed from most major news media and when
necessary attributed to Muammar Qaddafi’s
unsubstantiated oppression of the Libyan people.
However, the extent of this terrorism and the
US’s complicity was recently recounted by two US
citizens, Jim and Joanne Moriarity, who were in
Libya on business, had visited the country
numerous times, and witnessed the August 22, 2011 NATO assault on Tripoli.
“What we saw was three Apache helicopter attack
ships come in from the Mediterranean and mow down
every man, woman and child on the street,” Jim Moriarty recalls.
They killed 1,300 people in the first couple of
hours [and] wounded more than 5,000. From our
hotelwe were on the 21st floor of the Corinthia
Hotel which sits right on the Mediterraneanwe
could see two of [the Apaches] we could hear the
third one, and they were just killing everything.
The aerial attack preceded the introduction of
mercenary forces into the city. As Jim Moriarty recollects,
From the Corinthia Hotel we could see the Port
of Tripoli. And after these two-and-a-half days
of constant bombing and bombarding [by] attack
helicopters these boat loads of these Al Qaeda
types started flowing in from Benghazi into the
port, and there was an unending stream of
vehiclespick-up trucks with large weapons
mounted in the bedjust one after another after
another. There were miles and miles and miles of
these armed vehicles with bearded
thug[-like]-looking guys off-loading out of that
port. It was non-stop for a couple of days.
The Moriartys continue to describe how they were
held captive by NATO mercenary forces and
narrowly escaped being murdered and “chopped up”
at the behest of one guerilla
commander.<http://www.habilian.ir/en/201601172412/Articles/the-terrorism-dialectic-and-control-of-the-public-mind.html#_edn13>[13]
The number of deaths and injuries meted out by
NATO and its soldiers of fortune against the
Libyan people are largely stricken from the
record, even by seemingly trustworthy
organizations. For example, according to Human
Rights Watch, “The number of civilian deaths from
NATO air strikes in Libya was low [72 fatalities]
given the extent of the bombing and duration of
the campaign.” Human Rights Watch conducted a
study of eight sites throughout Libya where NATO
bombing occurred. “Overall, NATO took a lot of
measures to minimize civilian casualties,” Fred
Abrahams, an advisor to the study. “The choice of
targets, the choice of weapons, the timing of the
attacks, but these 72 people did lose their
lives.”<http://www.habilian.ir/en/201601172412/Articles/the-terrorism-dialectic-and-control-of-the-public-mind.html#_edn14>[14]
Whether contrived or sincere, such observations
serve as public relations for NATO, particularly
since they fail to acknowledge that Qaddafi’s
regime was popular among the Libyan people. According to Joanne Moriarity,
The problem was Tripoli was the largest city in
Libyaof two million peopleand completely
supported the government. So they were not going
to bend over [or] open their arms to Al Qaeda
coming in to their country. So NATO got tired of
waiting, I guess, and just decided to kill
everybody that was in the way. Not that they had
been doing that beforethey hadbut this was a
big
attack.<http://www.habilian.ir/en/201601172412/Articles/the-terrorism-dialectic-and-control-of-the-public-mind.html#_edn15>[15]
The mass killing by US-NATO forces continues to
be unreported in US news media, and the Moriartys
have yet to be interviewed by any major
newspapers, commercial television networks, or
even liberal-left “alternative” media outlets,
such as Democracy Now! or MSNBC. Accounts of
wholesale terrorism do not fit the preferred
mythos that the US is a benevolent force of good
in the world and, moreover, no one wants to be
the first to call out the Nobel Peace
Prize-winning war criminal and leader of the free world.
A similar scenario has played out in Syria, where
for over two years the Syria people have
experienced an intensive terrorist campaign waged
by some of the same forces that ravaged Libya.
Close to 100,000 have been killed and, much like
the US media’s representation of NATO’s assault
on Libya, the operation is depicted as a popular
insurgency of “rebel fighters” against the
allegedly brutal regime of Bashar-al Assad, a
physician who in 2012 banned genetically modified
foods “to preserve the health of human
beings.”<http://www.habilian.ir/en/201601172412/Articles/the-terrorism-dialectic-and-control-of-the-public-mind.html#_edn16>[16]
The US State Department’s delisting of the
Mujahedin-e Khalq as a terrorist organization in
2012 is especially instructive to this
discussion, for it signals the MEK’s transition
under US and Israeli auspices to official the
wholesale terrorist organization worthy of more
overt funding and support from the US military
and intelligence services. In this way the US now
must acknowledge and take responsibility for the
demise of at least 17,000 Iranians who have perished at the hands of the MEK.
The move nevertheless fits the retail-wholesale
terrorism dialectic since Iran has been cast as a
principal sponsor of Hezbollah, deemed by
Washington as an international terrorist
organization. The semantics are significant sine
they serve to direct public awareness away from
the wholesale terrorism of NATO, Israel and the US.
Terrorism requires definition and explanation to
function as an instrument of political and social
control. In the US and Europe acts of coordinated
violence and destruction are presented and
perceived as petty retail terror when in fact
they are being carried out by state actors. The
efficacy of such terror lies in the broader
public’s inability to recognize or ponder whether
such events have been perpetrated by agents of its own government.
Such a phenomenon suggests the tremendous
achievements of a modern propaganda system
comprised of what often masquerades as education,
entertainment, and journalism in America. The
overarching myth that government is a
transcendent guardian of the people’s interests
takes many years to instill and required
continued cultivation via corporate media
especially. The unfortunate reality is that much
of the government remains largely unresponsive if
not contemptuous of the people’s interests and
concerns in lieu of those that serve prevailing financial corporatist designs.
As the wholesale state terror against Libya,
Syria, Palestine and Iran ensues it is similarly
carried out in stealth form against the American
people, with their civil liberties being the most
ostensible target. The militarization of our
local police forces and the rise of the
surveillance state has culminated in the
theatrics of the Boston Marathon bombing that was
used as a rationale to invoke full martial law
throughout the Boston area that included people
being expulsed from their homes at gunpoint, much
like the US military acts in the countries it
occupies. The local citizenry accepted this
behavior, with some in fact cheering it on.
If the American public cannot recognize the state
terror exercises occurring underneath its nose,
it is difficult to imagine that it will be able
to distinguish, understand and thereby act to
prevent the forces that oppress those in foreign
locales. We can only hope that further analysis
of state terrorism in all its forms can inform
and enlighten individuals who might develop the
critical mass to contest such illegal acts and
atrocities. As Martin Luther King Jr. observes,
“The arc of the moral universe is long, but it bends toward justice. “
<http://www.habilian.ir/en/201601172412/Articles/the-terrorism-dialectic-and-control-of-the-public-mind.html#_ednref1>[1]
Trevor Aaronson, The Terror Factory: Inside the
FBI’s Manufactured War on Terrorism, Brooklyn NY: Ig Publishing.
<http://www.habilian.ir/en/201601172412/Articles/the-terrorism-dialectic-and-control-of-the-public-mind.html#_ednref2>[2]
Edward S. Herman, The Real Terror Network,
Boston: South End Press, Edward S. Herman and
David Peterson, “The Threat of Global State
Terrorism: Retail vs. Wholesale Terrorism,” Z
Magazine, January 2002. Available
at<http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/Herman%20/Threat_Global_Terrorism.html.>http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/Herman%20/Threat_Global_Terrorism.html.
<http://www.habilian.ir/en/201601172412/Articles/the-terrorism-dialectic-and-control-of-the-public-mind.html#_ednref3>[3]
The MacBride Commission Report, Many Voices, One
World: Toward a New, More Just, and More
Efficient World Information and Communication
Order, Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, 2003 (1980).
<http://www.habilian.ir/en/201601172412/Articles/the-terrorism-dialectic-and-control-of-the-public-mind.html#_ednref4>[4]
A Noble Lie (documentary film), James Lane,
director, Oklahoma City, Free Mind Films, 2011, at 20:18.
<http://www.habilian.ir/en/201601172412/Articles/the-terrorism-dialectic-and-control-of-the-public-mind.html#_ednref5>[5]
A Noble Lie, James Lane (director), at 34:40 and 39:40.
<http://www.habilian.ir/en/201601172412/Articles/the-terrorism-dialectic-and-control-of-the-public-mind.html#_ednref6>[6]
Charles Key, The Final Report on the Bombing of
the Alfred P. Murrah Building, Oklahoma City, 2001.
<http://www.habilian.ir/en/201601172412/Articles/the-terrorism-dialectic-and-control-of-the-public-mind.html#_ednref7>[7]
Interview with Charles Key, in A Noble Lie, James Lane (director), at 1:02:33.
<http://www.habilian.ir/en/201601172412/Articles/the-terrorism-dialectic-and-control-of-the-public-mind.html#_ednref8>[8]
Tim Rohan,
“<http://www.nytimes.com/2013/04/16/us/witnesses-describe-scene-of-carnage-after-blasts-at-boston-marathon.html?_r=0>War
Zone at Mile 26; ‘So Many People Without Legs,’”
New York Times, April 16, 2013.
<http://www.habilian.ir/en/201601172412/Articles/the-terrorism-dialectic-and-control-of-the-public-mind.html#_ednref9>[9]
James F. Tracy,
“<http://memoryholeblog.com/2013/04/22/witnessing-bostons-mass-casualty-event/>Witnessing
Boston’s Mass Casualty Event,”
Memoryholeblog.com, April 22, 2013. See also
extensive research conducted on the Boston
Marathon bombing aftermath at
<http://nodisinfo.com/Home/category/boston-bombing/>Nodisinfo.com.
<http://www.habilian.ir/en/201601172412/Articles/the-terrorism-dialectic-and-control-of-the-public-mind.html#_ednref10>[10]
James F. Tracy,
“<http://memoryholeblog.com/2013/04/26/the-unlikely-antics-of-bostons-cowboy-hero/>The
Unlikely Antics of Boston’s Cowboy Hero,” Memoryholebloglcom, April 26, 2013.
<http://www.habilian.ir/en/201601172412/Articles/the-terrorism-dialectic-and-control-of-the-public-mind.html#_ednref11>[11]
James F. Tracy,
“<http://memoryholeblog.com/2013/05/21/obamas-fema-director-planned-boston-mass-casualty-event-in-2008/>Obama’s
FEMA Director Planned Boston Mass Casualty Event
in 2008,” Memoryholeblog.com, May 21, 2013.
<http://www.habilian.ir/en/201601172412/Articles/the-terrorism-dialectic-and-control-of-the-public-mind.html#_ednref12>[12]
See, for example, Shannon Arledge,
“<http://www.fema.gov/about-fema/employee-news-and-announcements/integrated-capstone-event-merges-four-mass-casualty>Integrated
Capstone Event Merges Four Mass Casualty Response
Courses,” FEMA.gov, last updated May 28, 2013.
<http://www.habilian.ir/en/201601172412/Articles/the-terrorism-dialectic-and-control-of-the-public-mind.html#_ednref13>[13]
<http://www.thepowerhour.com/past_shows/schedule_07_15_2013.htm>Jim
and Joanne Moriarty, Interviewed by Joyce Riley,
The Power Hour, GCN Network, July 16, 2013.
<http://www.habilian.ir/en/201601172412/Articles/the-terrorism-dialectic-and-control-of-the-public-mind.html#_ednref14>[14]
“<http://www.hrw.org/news/2012/05/14/nato-investigate-civilian-deaths-libya>NATO:
Investigate Civilian Deaths in Libya,” Human Rights Watch, May 14, 2012.
<http://www.habilian.ir/en/201601172412/Articles/the-terrorism-dialectic-and-control-of-the-public-mind.html#_ednref15>[15]
<http://www.thepowerhour.com/past_shows/schedule_07_15_2013.htm>Jim
and Joanne Moriarty, Interviewed by Joyce Riley.
<http://www.habilian.ir/en/201601172412/Articles/the-terrorism-dialectic-and-control-of-the-public-mind.html#_ednref16>[16]
“<http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/world/assad-bans-gmos-in-food-to-preserve-the-health-of-human-beings/article4620664/>Assad
Bans GMOs in Food “to Preserve the Health of
Human Beings,” Globe and Mail, October 18, 2012.
--
--
Please consider seriously the reason why these elite institutions are not discussed in the mainstream press despite the immense financial and political power they wield?
There are sick and evil occultists running the Western World. They are power mad lunatics like something from a kids cartoon with their fingers on the nuclear button! Armageddon is closer than you thought. Only God can save our souls from their clutches, at least that's my considered opinion - Tony
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"PEPIS" group. Please feel free to forward it to anyone who might be interested
particularly your political representatives, journalists and spiritual leaders/dudes.
To post to this group, send email to pepis@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to pepis-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/pepis?hl=en
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PEPIS" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to pepis+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.