Russian Insider advises us... How to spot a false flag attack...
How To Spot A False Flag Event
http://www.911forum.org.uk/board/viewtopic.php?p=172939#172939
"For the most part, the mainstream media is
little more than a propaganda ministry for the federal government."
http://russia-insider.com/en/politics/how-spot-false-flag-event/ri15316
http://theantimedia.org/5-confirmed-false-flag-operations/
https://t.co/PlTpNsKXIq
Chuck Baldwin Subscribe to Chuck Baldwin(Chuck
Baldwin LIVE) Subscribe to Chuck Baldwin LIVEThu, Jun 30, 2016 | 6,324 12
Originally appeared at Chuck Baldwin LIVE
A missionary friend of mine in Eastern Europe
recently gave me a heads up regarding an
excellent article written by Sebastian Swift
entitled "5 Confirmed False Flag Operations And
How To Spot Them In The Future."
Swift writes, "The false flag phenomenon is
distinctively modern and used as an ideological
weapon to control populations with the fear of a
manufactured enemy. They are used in ostensibly
democratic systems where people believe they have
inalienable rights. Such democratic
systems--primarily the United States, Israel, and
Great Britain--must shock people into
sociopolitical and geopolitical consent and, as
such, require sophisticated modern propaganda
systems and advanced covert operations teams with highly proficient skills."
Here are his telltale signs of a false flag operation:
There is an immediate comprehensive narrative,
including a convenient culprit. Law enforcement,
government agencies, and the mainstream media
immediately proffer a narrative that completely
explains the event and encourages citizens to tie
their intellectual understanding of the tragedy
to the emotions they experience. In his lecture
at Contact in the Desert, [author and researcher]
Richard Dolan noted that a distinguishing
characteristic of a false flag operation is that
the official narrative IS NOT questioned by the
media. There are often legislative, ideological
and sociopolitical power plays waiting in the
wings, which the government can immediately implement.
The official narrative has obvious domestic and
geopolitical advantages for the governing body.
The Bush administration used 9/11 to usher in the
War on Terror, which has served as a lynchpin for
countless civil liberty infringements by the
national security state, including ubiquitous
domestic surveillance and indefinite detention.
The narrative behind the attack serves to
leverage emotions like fear, as well as
patriotism, in order to manufacture consent
around a previously controversial issue. For
example, many of the recent domestic terror
attacks, including the Aurora [and Orlando]
shooting[s], have exacerbated and reinforced
advocacy of gun control legislation.
Military training drills and police drills occur
on the day of and very near the attack itself,
causing confusion to obscure eye witness
testimony and allowing orchestrators to plant
both patsies, disinformation and backup
operatives. This is no small point. An incredible
percentage of major domestic or international
terror attacks have involved simultaneous
"training drills.” This list includes, but is not
limited to, the infamous NORAD drills of 9/11,
the 7/7 London Bombings, the 2011 Norway
shooting, the Aurora shooting, Sandy Hook, and
the Boston Marathon. Though none of the
aforementioned events can be confirmed or denied
without a doubt, they bear a striking resemblance
to previous false flag attacks and should be
looked at with an investigative eye.
See the article here.
It's time for those of us who have been reluctant
to consider the possibility that our own
government (and the governments of Israel and
Great Britain) could actually be complicit in
domestic terrorism in order to further a
nefarious agenda to at least stop accepting the
government and media’s version of these tragedies
at face value. For the most part, the mainstream
media is little more than a propaganda ministry
for the federal government. We haven’t seen true
objective investigative journalism since before the death of John F. Kennedy.
Granted, not every national tragedy is part of a
government conspiracy--and there is a plethora of
"conspiracy nuts" out there to whom EVERYTHING is
a conspiracy and through which we must wade to
try to ascertain the truth. These people make it
difficult for all of us. The Internet has
provided the Chicken Littles of the world with an
opportunity to play journalist. And their
“everything's-a-conspiracy” rants only serve to
mask the true conspiracies and turn the average
John Doe away from the truth. That’s why I
believe that many of these
“conspiracy-everywhere” Internet bloggers are
actually PART OF THE CONSPIRACY. Their job is to
make genuine whistleblowers and researchers look
like conspiracy “kooks.” Then, of course, there
are genuine kooks out there, too.
Regardless, the similarities and "coincidences"
of many of these national tragedies are just too
numerous for rational people to ignore. I believe
Mr. Swift's analysis is very intelligent, coherent, and plausible.
Our Founding Fathers believed their government
(the British Crown) was deliberately conspiring
against them. Thomas Jefferson said as much in our Declaration of Independence:
“Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments
long established should not be changed for light
and transient causes; and accordingly all
experience hath shewn, that mankind are more
disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable,
than to right themselves by abolishing the forms
to which they are accustomed. But when a long
train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing
invariably the same Object evinces a design to
reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their
right, it is their duty, to throw off such
Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.”
Read it again: “But when a long train of abuses
and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same
Object evinces a DESIGN to reduce them under
absolute Despotism . . . .” Jefferson and the
rest of America’s founders believed that there
was a “design” (i.e, “plot,” “scheme,” or
“conspiracy,” if you please) to “reduce them
under absolute Despotism.” So, if you believe
that government conspiracy is only for kooks, you
must include America’s Founding Fathers in that group.
Patrick Henry may have said it best: "We are apt
to shut our eyes against a painful truth, and
listen to the song of that siren, till she
transforms us into beasts. Is this the part of
wise men, engaged in a great and arduous struggle
for liberty? Are we disposed to be of the number
of those who, having eyes, see not, and having
ears, hear not, the things which so nearly concern their temporal salvation?
"For my part, whatever anguish of spirit it may
cost, I am willing to know the whole truth--to
know the worst and to provide for it."
I submit if we deliberately "shut our eyes
against a painful truth," liberty is not long for
this country. And there is plenty of blame to go around.
Obviously, the “no conspiracy” group is
contributing greatly to the demise of liberty by
their unwillingness to even examine the evidence
suggesting government conspiracies. Truly, they
are shutting their eyes “against a painful
truth.” And, unfortunately, this group is most
prevalent among pastors, Christians, and churches.
I find it incredible that people who supposedly
study their Bibles are so completely blind to
government conspiracies. The Old and New
Testaments are replete with examples of
government conspiracies. Jewish governments,
especially, were notorious for conspiring against
God’s prophets in the Old Testament and against
Jesus and the Apostles in the New Testament.
Plus, the New Testament plainly pictures the
master conspirator, Satan, as being the “god of
this world” and “the prince of the power of the
air.” His offer to Christ on the Mount of
Temptation to give Jesus the “kingdoms of the
world” was NOT challenged by the Lord. In other
words, Jesus didn’t dispute the fact that Satan
controls many, if not most, of the world’s
governments. The Book of Ephesians warns against
the conspiracy of “principalities,” “powers,”
“rulers of the darkness of this world,” and
“spiritual wickedness in high places.” Every
Bible commentator that I respect includes wicked
civil magistrates within these personages. Yet
when one brings up the possibility of government
conspiracies to the average church member, he or
she is treated as if they have the palsy.
Nowhere is this attitude of the denial of
conspiracies more evident than in the whole
Muslim versus America façade. Almost no Christian
leader seems to be able to see the “man behind
the curtain” in this whole affair. They have
absolutely NO concept of what the governments of
the U.S., Great Britain, Israel, Turkey, and
Saudi Arabia are surreptitiously doing to
instigate and foment this “war with Islam.” (Of
course, there is no war against the Islamic
states of Saudi Arabia and Turkey; they are our
“allies.”) Christians aren’t even willing to
study the matter. Therefore, the devil--along
with the evil miscreants inside Western
governments that he controls--is able to go about
his diabolical work completely undetected.
But, in all fairness, the
“everything's-a-conspiracy” group must also share
culpability in our country’s demise. There are
too many professing “patriots” who seem to have
no honesty or objectivity whatsoever. To them,
everything government does is bad whether it is
or isn’t. And, of course, they, the so-called “patriots,” can do NOTHING wrong.
For example, if a black kid in an inner city is
unjustly killed by a police officer, these
“patriots” say absolutely NOTHING. But if one of
their “own” is justly killed by police, they
scream “tyranny” and shout about the need for
revolution. Such people seem to have no reasoning
ability and no understanding of Natural Law. They
are agenda driven as surely as are big-government
toadies. In fact, some of these “patriot”
Internet bloggers and radio broadcasters are no
better than the mainstream media: they twist the
truth in order to pander to the people who are
supporting them financially. It’s not about
principle; it’s not about truth; it’s not about
the rule of law. It’s all about their financial success.
When we only condemn injustice committed by
government, while overlooking and condoning
injustice committed by so-called “patriots,” we
lose all credibility and integrity. Everything is
not a conspiracy. Every policeman or federal
agent is not a Jackboot. Sometimes there are real
acts of violence committed by real deranged
criminals with no help whatsoever from
anyone--including anyone in government. And
sometimes there are so-called “patriots” who are
themselves evil, using the freedom movement for
their own ulterior purposes. And, of course,
there are well-intentioned people who sometimes
do very foolish and unwise things. And only
foolish and unwise people would condone and
support foolish and unwise actions, even if they are well-intentioned.
I totally agree with Sebastian Swift’s article
that there are indeed false flag operations being
perpetrated by rogue elements within
government--including the governments of the
United States, Great Britain, and Israel. I
further agree that people need to honestly and
objectively be alert for the identifying
characteristics of these false flag operations.
More than that, the American people need to begin
holding our civil magistrates accountable for
these operations, as they could not continue
without the tacit support of our elected representatives and President.
But what we do NOT need are phony “patriots” who
do nothing but distract, confuse, and incite by
calling everything a conspiracy and who
themselves are guilty of unlawful
conduct--unlawful conduct as defined by God and
Natural Law. (This is why the ignorance and
silence of America’s pulpits is such an egregious
crime: people do not even know how to discern
lawful and unlawful conduct because pastors are
not teaching them these Biblical Natural Law
principles.) Plus, I am personally convinced that
many of these hot-headed so-called “patriots” are
in reality government agent provocateurs who are
deliberately trying to incite real patriots into doing something stupid.
Again, I submit if we deliberately "shut our eyes
against a painful truth," liberty is not long for
this country. And that includes admitting when a
tragedy is NOT a conspiracy. But it also means
admitting when evidence suggests that it IS.
5 Confirmed False Flag Operations and How to Spot Them in the Future
July 14, 2015 | ANTIMEDIA
http://theantimedia.org/5-confirmed-false-flag-operations/
Sebastian Swift
July 14, 2015
(ANTIMEDIA) The concept of the “false flag”
operation has become almost prohibitively
stigmatized in recent years because of the 9/11
“truther” movement and the emotional fallout from
the tragedies at Sandy Hook, Aurora, Boston and
others. In spite of being labeled “conspiracy
theories,” real, verifiable false flag events
have taken place in the past. Such examples serve
to dismantle the notion that false flags are
meritless conspiracy theories and can help
destigmatize the concept itself, providing the
diagnostic lens needed to identify false flags when they arise.
Author Richard Dolan made a presentation at the
2015 Contact in the Desert conference about what
he calls the “false flag era.” According to
Dolan, because false flag operations require
control over the global media narrative and the
ability to intimidate other countries into not
speaking out against “inside jobs,” only a few
countries have the means and motives to pull them off.
The false flag phenomenon is distinctively modern
and used as an ideological weapon to control
populations with the fear of a manufactured
enemy. They are used in ostensibly democratic
systems where people believe they have
inalienable rights. Such democratic
systems—primarily the United States, Israel, and
Great Britain—must shock people into
sociopolitical and geopolitical consent and, as
such, require sophisticated modern propaganda
systems and advanced covert operations teams with highly proficient skills.
Operation Gladio
Operation Gladio was a post-World War II program
established by the CIA, NATO, and possibly
Britain’s M16 to fight communism in Europe by
whatever means necessary. The two-decade
operation used CIA-created “stay behind” networks
as part of a “Strategy of Tension” that unleashed
a multitude of terrorist attacks from the late
1960s to the early 1980s. The attacks were blamed
on Marxists and other left-wing political
opponents in order to discredit communism. The
operation involved multiple bombings that killed
hundreds of innocent people, including children.
The most notable attack was the August 2, 1980
bombing of the Bologna train station, which killed 85 people.
How do we know about Operation Gladio in spite of
its incredibly clandestine nature? There are two
principle sources. One, the investigations of
Italian judge Felice Casson, whose presentation
was so compelling it forced Italian Prime
Minister Giulio Andreotti to confirm Gladio’s
existence. The second source is testimony from an
actual Gladio operative, Vincenzo Vinciguerra,
who is serving a life sentence for murder. In a
1990 interview with the Guardian, Vincenzo stated
that Gladio was designed to psychologically
coerce the Italian public to rely on the state for security.
Operation Ajax
In 1953, the CIA launched Operation Ajax in order
to overthrow Iran’s democratically elected
leader, Mohammed Mosaddiq, and replace him with
the Shah, a ruthless dictator. The United States
sought to depose Iran’s nationalized
Anglo-Persian oil company and install 5 U.S. oil
companies to take over the nation’s oil fields.
In order to do so, they staged a false flag
operation that utilized propaganda and complex
political maneuvers in order to create public
revolt that eventually led to the United States
and Britain’s MI6 military intelligence
re-installing the Shah in order to throttle
Iran’s oil supplies and transform the nation into
a puppet regime of the United States government.
Most information relevant to this CIA-sponsored
coup is declassified now and available in the CIA archives.
The CIA described itself Operation Ajax:
“The world has paid a heavy price for the lack of
democracy in most of the Middle East. Operation
Ajax taught tyrants and aspiring tyrants that the
world’s most powerful governments were willing to
tolerate limitless oppression as long as
oppressive regimes were friendly to the West and
to Western oil companies. That helped tilt the
political balance in a vast region away from freedom and toward dictatorship.”
The Lavon Affair
In 1954, a year after Operation Ajax, Israel
launched its own false flag operation. Code-named
Operation Susannah, the Lavon Affair featured the
covert operation of Israeli agents who planted
bombs in several Egyptian, American, and
British-owned cinemas, libraries and educational
centers, including a United States diplomatic
facility, framing eight Egyptian Muslims as the perpetrators.
One of the bombs detonated prematurely, which
caused one of the bombers to be captured. A
public trial exposed the Israeli spy ring and the
covert operation. The operatives were convicted
and two of them executed. Israeli Defense
Minister Pinhas Lavon was forced to step down
because of the scandal. However, the more
far-reaching consequences of the Lavon Affair
demonstrate once again how governments use false
flags to achieve certain objectives that might
not have been possible otherwise. In this case,
according to a Stanford published paper, the
operation triggered a chain reaction of game-changing events:
“A retaliatory military incursion by Israel into
Gaza that killed 39 Egyptians; a subsequent
Egyptian–Soviet arms deal that angered American
and British leaders, who then withdrew previously
pledged support for the building of the Aswan
Dam; the announced nationalization of the Suez
Canal by Nasser in retaliation for the withdrawn
support; and the subsequent failed invasion of
Egypt by Israel, France, and Britain in an
attempt to topple Nasser. In the wake of that
failed invasion, France expanded and accelerated
its ongoing nuclear cooperation with Israel,
which eventually enabled the Jewish state to build nuclear weapons.”
COINTELPRO
COINTELPRO was a series of clandestine, illegal
FBI projects that infiltrated domestic political
organizations to discredit and smear them. This
included critics of the Vietnam War, civil rights
leaders like Dr. Martin Luther King, and a wide
variety of activists and journalists.
mlkletters
An example of the FBI’s attempts to convince
Martin Luther King Jr. to kill himself under COINTELPRO. Click to enlarge.
The acts committed against them included
psychological warfare, slander using forged
documents and false reports in the media,
harassment, wrongful imprisonment and, according
to some, intimidation and possibly violence and assassination.
A U.S. Congressional committee documented the
false flag component of the campaign, describing
how the FBI had hired provocateurs from the 1950s
through the 1970s to commit criminal and violent
acts and falsely blame them on political
activists. The campaign worked extremely
effectively at disrupting the progressive momentum of the era.
Despite being formally discontinued, new
permutations of COINTELPRO have persisted and
include present-day efforts to undermine
activists, whistleblowers and protests. In fact,
a 2012 article published by The Guardian
described the FBI’s crackdown on the Occupy
movement as a “totally integrated corporate-state repression of dissent.”
Gulf of Tonkin
The Gulf of Tonkin incident, a major escalator of
U.S. involvement in the Vietnam War, never
actually occurred. The government essentially
staged—or at the very least, utilized a patently
false report—in order to manufacture a
geopolitical narrative with a ready-made enemy, the North Vietnamese.
The original incident—also sometimes referred to
as the U.S.S. Maddox Incident(s)—involved the
destroyer U.S.S. Maddox supposedly engaging three
North Vietnamese Navy torpedo boats as part of an
intelligence patrol. The Maddox fired almost 300 shells.
President Lyndon B. Johnson promptly drafted the
Gulf of Tonkin Resolution, which became his
administration’s legal justification for military
involvement in Vietnam. The problem is the event
never happened—and Johnson had no reason to believe it had.
In 2005, a declassified internal National
Security Agency study revealed that there were no
North Vietnamese naval vessels present during the
incident. So what was the Maddox firing at? In
1965, President Johnson commented, “For all I
know, our Navy was shooting at whales out there.”
The NSA’s own historian, Robert J. Hanyok, wrote
a report stating that the agency had deliberately
distorted intelligence reports in 1964. He concluded that
“The parallels between the faulty intelligence on
Tonkin Gulf and the manipulated intelligence used
to justify the Iraq War make it all the more
worthwhile to re-examine the events of August 1964.”
The Warning Signs of a False Flag Operation:
~There is an immediate comprehensive narrative,
including a convenient culprit. Law enforcement,
government agencies, and the mainstream media
immediately proffer a narrative that completely
explains the event and encourages citizens to tie
their intellectual understanding of the tragedy
to the emotions they experience. In his lecture
at Contact in the Desert, Richard Dolan noted
that a distinguishing characteristic of a false
flag operation is that the official narrative IS
NOT questioned by the media. There are often
legislative, ideological and sociopolitical power
plays waiting in the wings, which the government
can immediately implement. The most striking
example of this is the Patriot Act, which was
written well before 9/11 but seemed to correlate
entirely with the events that had transpired.
~The official narrative has obvious domestic and
geopolitical advantages for the governing body.
The Bush administration used 9/11 to usher in the
War on Terror, which has served as a lynchpin for
countless civil liberty infringements by the
national security state, including ubiquitous
domestic surveillance and indefinite detention.
It also directly paved the way for an invasion of
Afghanistan and Iraq—countries that had nothing
to do with the attacks—allowing our government
and defense contractors to control the natural
gas pipelines and oil fields. This bears a
striking resemblance to Operation Ajax.
~The narrative behind the attack serves to
leverage emotions like fear, as well as
patriotism, in order to manufacture consent
around a previously controversial issue. For
example, many of the recent domestic terror
attacks, including the Aurora shooting, have
exacerbated and reinforced advocacy of gun
control legislation. More importantly, these
attacks divide populations and invite the
government and militarized local police forces to
have the authority to declare martial law at
will, locking down entire neighborhoods. We saw
this after the Boston marathon bombing, the most
striking example of this nation’s post 9/11 police state mentality.
~Military training drills and police drills occur
on the day of and very near the attack itself,
causing confusion to obscure eye witness
testimony and allowing orchestrators to plant
both patsies, disinformation and backup
operatives. This is no small point. An incredible
percentage of major domestic or international
terror attacks have involved simultaneous
“training drills.” This list includes, but is not
limited to, the infamous NORAD drills of 9/11,
the 7/7 London Bombings, the 2011 Norway
shooting, the Aurora shooting, Sandy Hook, and
the Boston Marathon. Though none of the
aforementioned events can be confirmed or denied
without a doubt, they bear a striking resemblance
to previous false flag attacks and should be
looked at with an investigative eye.
The bigger false flags that occurred in the last
two decades undoubtedly utilized unimaginable
amounts of money and resources. It will take time
and many contributions by intrepid researchers
and whistleblowers to prove them.
The cases made for and against 9/11 being a false
flag “inside job” are voluminous and highly
controversial. The narrative is so convoluted
with disinformation that despite all of the
technology and online resources at our disposal,
it is highly unlikely we will know for sure how
many layers of shadow and black op agencies were
used—if, in fact, they were. What we do know is
that shortly before the events of 9/11,
then-Secretary of State Donald Rumsfeld announced
that $2.3 trillion dollars was missing from the
Pentagon’s budget. Unfortunately, too much
evidence has been destroyed or manipulated to
reach a conclusive verdict as to whether it was a
full blown false flag or an extreme case of state opportunism.
Remember, the story of the false flag phenomenon
is one that is still being written. Our analysis
of it must breach the most powerful information
control filters the world has ever seen. As
technology and social enlightenment make the
crimes of the world’s national governments
transparent, we will see shocking new chapters
added to this history that will shatter mainstream perceptions of reality.
This article (5 Confirmed False Flag Operations
and How to Spot Them in the Future) is free and
open source. You have permission to republish
this article under a Creative Commons license
with attribution to the author and
theAntiMedia.org. Tune in! Anti-Media Radio airs
Monday through Friday @ 11pm Eastern/8pm Pacific.
Help us fix our typos: ed...@theantimedia.org.
--
--
Please consider seriously the reason why these elite institutions are not discussed in the mainstream press despite the immense financial and political power they wield?
There are sick and evil occultists running the Western World. They are power mad lunatics like something from a kids cartoon with their fingers on the nuclear button! Armageddon is closer than you thought. Only God can save our souls from their clutches, at least that's my considered opinion - Tony
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"PEPIS" group. Please feel free to forward it to anyone who might be interested
particularly your political representatives, journalists and spiritual leaders/dudes.
To post to this group, send email to pepis@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to pepis-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/pepis?hl=en
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PEPIS" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to pepis+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.