Rearranging the deckchairs: Chancellor Philip
Hammond's Autumn Statement - Authoritarian
Britain: Briefing 2: 2008 bailout/heist and the death of capitalism
https://politicsthisweek.wordpress.com/2016/11/25/bcfms-weekly-politics-show-presented-by-tony-gosling-56/
Second hour: Investigative reports: Iraq truck
bomb kills 100 people at petrol station – mainly
Iranian Shia – Crisis Initiation, Amaq News
Agency, SITE website, White Helmets. Merkel with
Obama – internet 'disruptive' force that has to
be 'contained, managed and steered' by Government
–
Stratcom.
<http://evolvepolitics.com/labours-fake-news-crusader-michael-dugher-wrote-for-the-sn-quaffed-champagne-oysters-with-murdoch/>Labour's
'fake news' crusader Michael Dugher wrote for
The Sun and quaffed 'champagne' and 'oysters'
with Murdoch - deliberate lies or mistakes in
media – mainstream media not able to manipulate
events like used
to.
<https://consortiumnews.com/2016/11/18/what-to-do-about-fake-news/>What
to do about 'fake' news – by Robert Parry from
Consortium News - Bellingcat. Report urges UK to
'map', 'challenge', and expose public figures
with Russia links – e.g. those who have worked on
RT.
<http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/top-scientist-who-discovered-litvinenko-9325403>Harwell
nuclear scientist Matthew Puncher, who discovered
Russian investigative writer Alexander Litvinenko
polonium poison, 'stabbed himself to death with
two
knives'<http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/top-scientist-who-discovered-litvinenko-9325403>
after trip to Russia: polonium trail; Putin's
rise to power and Chief Russian Jewish Oligarch
Boris Berezovsky who died in suspicious
circumstances in London in 2013 – false flag
bombings in Moscow backed by West to stop
communism in Russia; 'Blowing up Russia' book by
Litvinenko; NTV programme about this
<https://twitter.com/hashtag/Litvinenko?src=hash>Alexander
Litvinen<https://twitter.com/hashtag/Litvinenko?src=hash>ko,
who really killed him & why? After ANOTHER
suspicious death we smash the
<https://twitter.com/hashtag/Litvinenko?src=hash>Litvinenko
polonium conspiracy to smithereens tonight -
Background to Alexander Litvinenko poisoning and
his
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9sx2YmSXDy8>2006
book 'Blowing Up Russia' about the 1999 Moscow
apartment bombings:
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q2Cl8lSv9Is>The
Rise of Putin and The Fall of The Russian-Jewish
Oligarchs - Authoritarian Britain, Briefing 2:
The 2008 bailout robbery and the death of
capitalism - Money: Gov. could print money and
put it straight into economy; economic warfare –
banks not tanks – political power – Desmond
Morton;
<http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FncbqFAHnjE>Daniel
Hopsicker in documentary 'The Federal Reserve:
Masters of the Universe' - money as servant not
master; Bill Still from 'Secret of Oz'
documentary – addressing money system; 2008 bank
bailout biggest heist in history; WWII governor
of the Bank of England Montague Norman – friend
of Nazis – set up BIS;
<https://twitter.com/ProfSteveKeen/status/794835983070097408>Steve
Keen economist. -
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YXo15EauE4M>Professor
Anthony Hall discussing the staged media event in
Iraq when Bush said 'mission accomplished' –
media as an advertisement to affect public opinion – 'public relations'.
download
http://www.radio4all.net/files/t...@cultureshop.org.uk/2149-1-20161125180002.mp3
U.K. Parliament Approves Unprecedented New Hacking And Surveillance Powers
https://theintercept.com/2016/11/22/ipbill-uk-surveillance-snowden-parliament-approved/
<https://theintercept.com/2016/11/22/ipbill-uk-surveillance-snowden-parliament-approved/https://theintercept.com/staff/ryan-gallagher/>Ryan
Gallagher
November 22 2016, 5:51 p.m.
A FEW YEARS AGO, it would have been unthinkable
for the British government to admit that it was
hacking into people’s computers and collecting
private data on a massive scale. But now, these
controversial tactics are about to be explicitly
sanctioned in an unprecedented new surveillance law.
Last week, the U.K.’s Parliament approved the
Investigatory Powers Bill, dubbed the “Snoopers’
Charter” by critics. The law, which is expected
to come into force before the end of the year,
was introduced in November 2015 after the fallout
from revelations by National Security Agency
whistleblower Edward Snowden about extensive
British mass surveillance. The Investigatory
Powers Bill essentially retroactively legalizes
the electronic spying programs exposed in the
Snowden documents and also expands some of the
government’s surveillance powers.
Perhaps the most controversial aspect of the new
law is that it will give the British government
the authority to serve internet service providers
with a “data retention notice,” forcing them to
record and store for up to 12 months logs showing
websites visited by all of their customers. Law
enforcement agencies will then be able to obtain
access to this data without any court order or
warrant. In addition, the new powers will hand
police and tax investigators the ability to, with
the approval of a government minister, hack into
targeted phones and computers. The law will also
permit intelligence agencies to sift through
“bulk personal datasets” that contain millions of
records about people’s phone calls, travel
habits, internet activity, and financial
transactions; and it will make it legal for
British spies to carry out
“<https://theintercept.com/2016/11/22/ipbill-uk-surveillance-snowden-parliament-approved/https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/473753/Factsheet-Bulk_Equipment_Interference.pdf>foreign-focused”
large-scale hacks of computers or phones in order
to identify potential “targets of interest.”
“Every citizen will have their internet activity
the apps they use, the communications they
send, and to who logged for 12 months,” says
Eric King, a privacy expert and former director
of
<https://theintercept.com/2016/11/22/ipbill-uk-surveillance-snowden-parliament-approved/https://www.dontspyonus.org.uk/>Don’t
Spy On Us, a coalition of leading British human
rights groups that campaigns against mass
surveillance. “There is no other democracy in the
world, possibly no other country in the world, doing this.”
“There is no other democracy in the world,
possibly no other country in the world, doing this.”
King argues that the new law will cause a
chilling effect, resulting in fewer people
feeling comfortable communicating freely with one
another. He cites
<https://theintercept.com/2016/11/22/ipbill-uk-surveillance-snowden-parliament-approved/http://www.pewinternet.org/2015/03/16/americans-privacy-strategies-post-snowden/>a
Pew surveypublished in March 2015 that found that
30 percent of American adults had altered their
phone or internet habits due to concerns about
government surveillance. “It’s going to change
how people communicate and express their
thoughts,” King says. “For a society that’s
supposed to be progressive, that encourages open
debate and dialogue, it’s awful.”
Other civil liberties advocates are concerned
that the new law will be viewed by governments
across the world as a green light to launch
similar sweeping surveillance regimes. “The
passing of the IP Bill will have an impact that
goes beyond the U.K.’s shores,” says Jim Killock,
executive director of the London-based
<https://theintercept.com/2016/11/22/ipbill-uk-surveillance-snowden-parliament-approved/https://www.openrightsgroup.org/>Open
Rights Group. “It is likely that other countries,
including authoritarian regimes with poor human
rights records, will use this law to justify
their own intrusive surveillance powers.”
Despite the broad scope of the Investigatory
Powers Bill, it generated little public debate in
the U.K., and did not receive a great deal of
coverage in the mainstream press. One reason for
this was undoubtedly the U.K.’s shock vote in
June to leave European Union known as Brexit
which has dominated news and discussion in recent
months. But there was another major factor for
the swift passage of the law in the face of
little backlash. The Labour Party, the U.K.’s
leading opposition political party, had pledged
to fight back against
“<https://theintercept.com/2016/11/22/ipbill-uk-surveillance-snowden-parliament-approved/https://www.buzzfeed.com/jamesball/jeremy-corbyn-still-supports-snoopers-charter-despite-launch>unwarranted
snooping,” but ended up supporting the government
and voting in favor of the new surveillance law.
“Blame has to be fixed on the Labour Party,” says
Killock. “They asked for far too little and
weren’t prepared to strongly challenge many of the central tenets of the bill.”
In an effort to placate some of its critics, the
government has agreed to strengthen oversight of
the surveillance. The Investigatory Powers Bill
introduces for the first time a “judicial
commissioner” likely a former senior judge
who will have the authority to review spying
warrants authorized by a government minister. It
also bolsters provisions relating to how police
and spy agencies can target journalists in a bid
to identify their confidential sources. New
safeguards will mean the authorities will have to
seek approval from the judicial commissioner
before obtaining a journalist’s phone or email
records; previously they could obtain this data
without any independent scrutiny.
The U.K.’s National Union of Journalists,
however, believes that the law does not go far
enough in protecting press freedom. The union is
particularly alarmed that any potential
surveillance of media organizations will be kept
completely secret, meaning they will not be
afforded the chance to challenge or appeal any
decisions relating to them or their sources. “The
bill is an attack on democracy and on the
public’s right to know and it enables
unjustified, secret, state interference in the
press,” the union
<https://theintercept.com/2016/11/22/ipbill-uk-surveillance-snowden-parliament-approved/https://www.nuj.org.uk/news/reaction-to-the-passing-of-the-investigatory-powers-bill/>blasted
in a statement last week, adding that “the lack
of protection for sources has an impact on
journalists working in war zones or those
investigating organized crime or state misconduct.”
Other issues relating to how the law will be
applied remain unclear. It contains a provision,
for instance, allowing the government to serve a
company with a “technical capability notice,”
which can include “obligations relating to the
removal by a relevant operator of electronic
protection applied by or on behalf of that
operator to any communications or data.” Earlier
this year, technology giants Apple, Facebook,
Google, Microsoft, Twitter, and Yahoo
<https://theintercept.com/2016/11/22/ipbill-uk-surveillance-snowden-parliament-approved/https://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201516/cmpublic/investigatorypowers/Memo/IPB21.htm>criticized
this power, expressing concerns that it could be
used by the government to force companies to
weaken or circumvent encryption technology used
to protect the privacy of communications and data.
In practice, if the law is used to undermine
encryption, it may never come to light. The
government included a section in the law that
criminalizes “unauthorized disclosures” of any
information related to its surveillance orders,
which could potentially deter any whistleblowers
or leakers from coming forward. The punishment
for breaches is a prison sentence of up to 12 months, a fine, or both.
Though the Investigatory Powers Bill will soon to
come into force, it is likely to face several
lawsuits. There are at least three ongoing cases
that could result in changes to some of its
provisions. One of these cases is a
<https://theintercept.com/2016/11/22/ipbill-uk-surveillance-snowden-parliament-approved/https://theintercept.com/2016/09/30/echr-nsa-gchq-snowden-surveillance-privacy/>major
challenge in the European Court of Human Rights,
which could potentially rule the government’s
mass collection and retention of data to be
illegal. (Judgments from the European Court of
Human Rights remain binding in the U.K., despite
its vote to leave the European Union.)
Either way, some are not willing to leave it up
to the courts to determine how much of their data
the government can vacuum up. One recently
established British nonprofit company, calling
itself
<https://theintercept.com/2016/11/22/ipbill-uk-surveillance-snowden-parliament-approved/https://brasshorncommunications.uk/>Brass
Horn Communications, says it is planning to build
a new internet provider that is based on
<https://theintercept.com/2016/11/22/ipbill-uk-surveillance-snowden-parliament-approved/https://torproject.org/>Tor
a tool used to browse the internet anonymously
in an effort to help people protect themselves
from the spying. “We should be able to research
an embarrassing medical condition, or ask
questions on Google, without having to worry
about it being stored on a permanent internet
record somewhere,” says a spokesperson for the
company. “The government has decided that
everyone is a suspect, but you can’t treat an entire society as criminal.”
RELATED
U.K. Parliament Debates “Snoopers’ Charter”
Seven Major Takeaways From the U.K.’s Proposed Surveillance Rules
So much emphasis is placed on select Jewish
participation in Bormann companies that when
Adolf Eichmann was seized and taken to Tel Aviv
to stand trial, it produced a shock wave in the
Jewish and German communities of Buenos Aires.
Jewish leaders informed the Israeli authorities
in no uncertain terms that this must never happen
again because a repetition would permanently
rupture relations with the Germans of Latin
America, as well as with the Bormann
organization, and cut off the flow of Jewish
money to Israel. It never happened again, and the
pursuit of Bormann quieted down at the request of
these Jewish leaders. He is residing in an
Argentinian safe haven, protected by the most
efficient German infrastructure in history as
well as by all those whose prosperity depends on his well-being.
<http://l.facebook.com/l.php?u=http%3A%2F%2Fspitfirelist.com%2Fbooks%2Fmartin-bormann-nazi-in-exile%2F&h=eAQErj17O>http://spitfirelist.com/books/martin-bormann-nazi-in-exile/
--
--
Please consider seriously the reason why these elite institutions are not discussed in the mainstream press despite the immense financial and political power they wield?
There are sick and evil occultists running the Western World. They are power mad lunatics like something from a kids cartoon with their fingers on the nuclear button! Armageddon is closer than you thought. Only God can save our souls from their clutches, at least that's my considered opinion - Tony
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"PEPIS" group. Please feel free to forward it to anyone who might be interested
particularly your political representatives, journalists and spiritual leaders/dudes.
To post to this group, send email to pepis@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to pepis-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/pepis?hl=en
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PEPIS" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to pepis+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
