BBC Trust to review own decision upholding
complaint about Corbyn 'shoot-to-kill' report
http://www.heraldscotland.com/news/15000158.BBC_Trust_to_review_own_decision_upholding_complaint_about_Corbyn__shoot_to_kill__report/
Rev. Andrew Ashdown: London media so biased,
supporting 'terrorist' Syrian rebels [tonight's radio show]
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ygo4iXty0BM
Church of England vicar, Reverend Andrew Ashdown,
just back from Aleppo, says Syrians consider
Russians 'heroes', says the nation's mainstream
London media have been providing support for
'terrorist' Syrian rebels - Interview with
Reverend Andrew Ashdown, who has visited the
Middle East regularly over the last 30 years,
including Syria before and during the war – he
says that the Western mainstream media narrative
on the war in Syria has been hugely
misleading: Christianity and Islam; political
agendas causing suffering; Russia withdrawing
troops from Syria; detailed maps of the progress
of Syria war on South Front; BBC Gordon Correra
interview with outgoing CIA chief John Brennan –
Russia making Syria worse; Russians are heroes
in Syria; how Islamist extremist ideology
works; message from Syrian people. CIA chief,
John Brennan, admits the Agency's role in Syrian
war, on NPR radio. The US road map to balkanise
Syria by Pepe Escobar - Oded Yinon plan. Attacks on New Years Eve in Turkey
https://politicsthisweek.wordpress.com/2017/01/06/bcfms-weekly-politics-show-presented-by-tony-gosling-60/
http://www.radio4all.net/index.php/program/90305
How Russia is preparing for WWIII
http://thesaker.is/how-russia-is-preparing-for-wwiii/
<http://www.unz.com/tsaker/how-russia-is-preparing-for-wwiii/>http://www.unz.com/tsaker/how-russia-is-preparing-for-wwiii/
I have recently posted a piece in which
<http://thesaker.is/debunking-popular-cliches-about-modern-warfare/>I
tried to debunk a few popular myths about modern
warfare. Judging by many comments which I
received in response to this post, I have to say
that the myths in question are still alive and
well and that I clearly failed to convince many
readers. What I propose to do today, is to look
at what Russia is really doing in response to the
growing threat from the West. But first, I have
to set the context or, more accurately, re-set
the context in which Russia is operating. Let’s
begin by looking at the AngloZionist policies towards Russia...
2016: The Year of Russia's Triumph
<http://www.unz.com/author/the-saker/>THE SAKER • DECEMBER 28, 2016
http://www.unz.com/tsaker/2016-the-year-of-russias-triumph/
Just like European maps place Europe in the
center of the planet, so do most western
commentators look at the past year from a
US/Europe-centered perspective. Which is fair
enough. Furthermore, the AngloZionist Empire has
just suffered two major disasters, the Brexit and
the election of Trump, so there is truly much
interesting to focus on. Still, what I want to do
today is to look at the year which is ending from
a Russian perspective. The following were the
major challenges Russia faced in 2016:
* The Nazi regime in Kiev
* The civil war in the Donbass
* Ukrainian attempts to blockade Crimea
* The rabid hostility of the US Administration
* NATO’s policy of military confrontation in Europe
* The united European front against Russia
* Western sanctions, the subsequent drop in
investments and credit and the low oil prices
* The growing dissatisfaction of the Russian
people with the economic polices of the government
* The struggle against the “liberal” 5th column inside Russia
* The international aggression against Syria
* The demonization of Russia in general and
of Vladimir Putin in particular
* Terrorist attacks against Russia
Let’s take these one by one now and score them:
The Ukraine 5/5
The Nazi occupied Ukraine is in free fall. In
fact, it has been in free fall for a while
already, but just like somebody jumping from the
40th floor of a building is doing “okay” passing
by the 20th floor, so did the Ukraine still have
the possibility to say “so far so good” and look
halfway credible to the superficially informed.
Now, however, it is becoming rather obvious that
the so-called “Revolution of dignity” (which is
how the Neonazis call the coup against
Yanukovich) is an abject failure and that the
“Independent Ukraine” is simply beyond rescue.
The ruling class which came to power now is
falling apart, everybody is fighting everybody
else and there is no other discernible policy
left beyond personal enrichment and survival. As
for the “Joan of Arc of the Ukraine” and “Hope of
the Ukraine” – Nadezhda Savchenko – she is now
denounced as a traitor and FSB agent. Forbes is
now running an article entitled “Corruption is
killing Ukraine’s economy” while a former
Ukrainian lawmaker has passed recordings of
Poroshenko taking bribes to the FBI. As for the
Ukrainian military, which Poroshenko has recently
advertised as one of the 5 best in the world, it
has only mustered enough forces to send one
company size infantry force supported by 2 tank
platoons to attack the Novorussian positions near
Debaltsevo before getting them all killed. The
situation of the Ukrainian military is so bad
that they are now forced to use private cars to
get to the frontlines and to evacuate the
wounded. Yes, on paper the Ukrainian military is
huge, but in reality it is a force which has a
hard time surviving even before going into
battle. Last but not least, the entire Nazi
ruling elite had thrown its full political weight
behind Hillary while pouring scorn and vitriol
against Trump. To say that they are now screwed
would be an understatement. Hence the mood of utter panic now taking over Kiev.
The Donbass 3/5
The Russian policy in the Donbass (non-occupation
combined with overt and covert support) was
clearly the correct one: the DNR and LNR are
getting stronger while the Nazi occupied Ukraine
is going down the tubes, vide supra, as they say.
There have however also been clear failures and
the two main ones are the Russian inability to
stop the constant shelling and attacks on
civilians from the Nazis and the Russian failure
to establish security inside the two republics.
If the first failure can be excused (there is no
magic recipe to make that happen), the second one
is inexcusable as seen by the murder of several
key Novorussian figures. Furthermore, the
situation in the Donbass remains very difficult
and potentially dangerous. In the big scheme of
things, Russia did very well, but as soon as you
look down to the more detailed level many
mistakes and failures become apparent. Still, it
is now obvious to any decently informed person
that time is now (and has always been, really) on
the side of the Novorussians as every passing day
makes them stronger and the Ukronazis weaker.
Crimea 5/5
The Urkonazis tried everything, from blockading
the peninsula, to cutting off water and
electricity, to sending terrorist infiltrators.
This gave Russia the opportunity to “save” Crimea
from the Ukraine over and over and over again. It
is pretty darn clear that the Ukronazis have long
given up of ever getting back Crimea and that all
that is left to them are mostly ineffective ways
to try to make the people of Crimea miserable
thereby, of course, only strengthening their
resolve. Initially there were some people in
Crimea who were not quite convinced that the
nightmare was really over and that Russia truly
meant business (especially with all the rumors
about “Putin selling out”). But now that the
Russians have to put major efforts into shielding
Crimea from the Ukronazi attempts at blockading
it those doubts have disappeared. Crimea’s future
looks extremely bright: not only is the Russian
state pouring in billions of Rubles for huge
infrastructural improvement and the deployment of
a very large and advanced military force, but the
prospects for tourism and trade are also excellent.
The United States 5/5
The credit for the election of Donald Trump goes
first and foremost to the American people to whom
I sincerely believe the entire planet owe a
heartfelt and loud “THANK YOU!!!!!”. I will never
be able to prove that and, thank God, we will
never know if I was right, but up to the last
minute I was convinced that there was a very
strong probability that Hillary in the White
House would have meant war, probably nuclear,
with Russia. I am still undecided about Trump,
but I view his upcoming term with cautious
optimism and while I would never say never, I
really very strongly feel that with Trump in the
White House the risks of war with Russia have
fallen to a dramatically low level and that
barring some stunning provocation or disaster, a
war between the USA and Russia has now become
exceedingly unlikely. Glory be to God for His immense mercy towards us!
That being, said, I will dare to speculate that
Russia did play a role in the election of Trump.
No, not by hacking emails or by recruiting Ron
Paul (!!!) as an agent of Russian propaganda, but
by openly and firmly confronting the USA on all
fronts and showing that Russia would not bend her
knee before the AngloZionist Empire. As I have
written many times, Russia has been preparing for
war for years now and while Russians were (and
still are) afraid of war, they are also ready and
willing to fight it if forced to do so. In his
latest press conference Putin specifically
referred to the will of the Russian people as a
key element in Russia’s ability to defeat any aggressor when he said,
We are stronger than any potential aggressor. I
have no problem repeating it. I also said why we
are stronger. This has to do with the effort to
modernise the Russian Armed Forces, as well as
the history and geography of our country, and the
current state of Russian society
and he is absolutely right. Sure, Hillary was
probably stupid enough to try to impose a no-fly
zone over Syria, but the 200 or so generals and
admirals who expressed their support for Trump
probably understood what that kind of folly would
entail. Furthermore, it appears that quite a few
Americans are sympathetic to Russia and Putin
himself. Again, in his latest press conference
Putin referred to this and made some very interesting comments:
I do not take support for the Russian President
among a large part of Republican voters as
support for me personally, but rather see it in
this case as an indication that a substantial
part of the American people share similar views
with us on the world’s organisation, what we
ought to be doing, and the common threats and
challenges we are facing. It is good that there
are people who sympathise with our views on
traditional values because this forms a good
foundation on which to build relations between
two such powerful countries as Russia and the
United States, build them on the basis of our
peoples’ mutual sympathy. (…) It seems to me that
Reagan would be happy to see his party’s people
winning everywhere, and would welcome the victory
of the newly elected President so adept at
catching the public mood, and who took precisely
this direction and pressed onwards to the very
end, even when no one except us believed he could win.
Putin puts it down to values, common values,
between the Russian and the American people.
[Personal sidebar: for whatever this is worth, I
regularly interact with Americans who support
Putin on the grounds that "he stands for American
values unlike the SOBs in Washington"].
But how did the Americans become aware of what
values Putin and Russia stood for if not for the
ceaseless efforts of Putin himself and the
alternative media to convey these values to the
general public? I think that by OPENLY denouncing
the total hypocrisy of the AngloZionist Empire
and by OPENLY offering a different civilizational
model, Putin and Russia did have an impact on the
public opinion in the West. To put it simply:
Russia has scored an ideological victory over the
AngloZionist imperialists. In other words, the
Russian policy of standing firm against the
Empire while openly challenging it on its
ideological foundation was the correct one and it
probably did have an impact upon the outcome of the election in the USA.
NATO 4/5
Russia has defeated NATO on two levels: a purely
military one and a political one. On the military
level Russia has taken all the asymmetrical
measures she promised to negate both the US
anti-missile system in Europe and the deployment
of threatening military power in eastern Europe:
Russia deployed the Iskander missile, doubled of
the size of her Airborne Forces, and initiated
the creation of a Tank Army in the western
strategic direction (to read more about how
Russia prepared to fight and defeat NATO see “How
Russia is preparing for WWIII” and “The EU’s
suicide by reality denial“). On the political
level there can be little doubt that all the
European leaders who favored confrontation with
Russia are now unpopular and in a political
crisis except maybe Merkel, but Germany alone
can’t do anything meaningful (at least one
“positive” side effect, so to speak, of the EU
integration). As for the election of Trump, it
has resulted in a NATO-wide panic, especially in
those countries which had prostituted themselves
to the Empire with special enthusiasm and zeal
(Poland, the three Baltic statlets, Sweden,
Denmark, Holland, and our “Orthodox brothers” in
Romania and Bulgaria). I don’t see Trump dumping
NATO, there would be too much opposition against
that, but with Trump in the White House all the
nonsense about the “Russian bear is about to
invade Latvia or Poland” is going to come to a
crashing end and the poor folks in eastern Europe
will come to realize that neither Russia nor the
USA gives a damn about them. Trump will probably
put the financial squeeze on NATO and force its
member states to purchase even more US gear, but
that will be a purely financial operation and not
an attempt at surrounding Russia will military
forces. Russia’s ultimate goal, the replacement
of NATO by a European-wide common defense
agreement from Portugal to the Urals has not
happened, but the election of Trump is a huge step in the right direction.
The EU 5/5
Poor “EUans” (my own word for the European
zombies who believed in the Bilderberger’s
European Union): they are now, how shall I put it
politely, totally “frigged”? Not only did the
British people defy the Empire and vote for a
Brexit, but now the Imperial Homeland has
“backstabbed” them by electing a patriot who is
not interested in maintaining the global empire
(or so he says, at least for the time being). At
the same time, the so-called “refugee crisis” is
bringing several crucial EU nations to the brink
of a civil war (France for example) while all the
efforts of the elites to blame Russia for it all
end up in abject failures. Just check out this
hilarious article in the British Sun which
accuses Russia of, I kid you not, “organizing sex
attacks in Germany“!! True, we already had the
“Serbian Chetniks using rape as a weapon of
ethnic cleansing” and “Gaddafi distributing
Viagra to his soldiers to rape opposition
supporters” but Putin ordering refugees to rape
women in Germany is the best, so to speak. And
just in case the unthinkable happens in Germany,
the Germans have already warned that Russian
hackers might steal the election in Germany. If
this was not so utterly disgusting it would be
hilarious. The bottom line is this: the entire EU
project is morally completely bankrupt, each EU
member state is now in a deep political crisis
and the so-called “elites” are scrambling to find
a response to what appears to be an inevitable
collapse of the EU-order over Europe. The
European militaries are a joke, all of them, and
when, say, the Swedes go on “Russian sub hunting”
they always end up embarrassing themselves. If
there are any extra-terrestrials observing us
from space, the EU is beyond any doubt their
laughing stock. As for the Russians, far from
fearing the Europeans, they don’t even take them
very seriously and they look at them with either
pity or scorn for their apparently infinite lack
of spine and dignity. Of sure, as soon as
mentally sane leaders return to power in the
various EU countries Russia will be more than
happy to trade with the EU, send and receive
tourists and generally have friendly relations.
But after over three centuries of trying to
sheepishly imitate the Europeans and be accepted
as European themselves, the Russian have finally
lost all interest in emulating Europe, at least
in a cultural or political way. Of course, the
Russians will still love German cars, French
wines or Italian music, but the myth of the
European cultural superiority has truly died. Good riddance!
The Russian economy 3/5
The main external factors influencing the Russian
economy have been Western sanctions, the
subsequent drop in investments and credit and,
especially, the low oil prices. Almost exactly as
Putin had predicted it, it took Russia two years
to overcome the combined effect of these factors,
so says not me or a Kremlin spokesman, but the
IMF (see here). What matters here is not this or
that figure for GDP or inflation, but the fact
that all the key indicators for the Russian
economy point to a gradual recovery and good
prospects for growth. I personally think that the
policies of the “economic block” of the Medvedev
government made the effects of this crisis even
worse than they had to be, but I have to admit
that despite the major mistakes committed by the
Russian government the Russian economy is
recovering. If I had to score the performance of
the Russian government’s policies I would have
given it a maximum of 2/5, but since what I am
looking at is the state of the economy I have to
give it an objective 3/5. I just think that a 5/5
would have been possible. One small point here:
some have made a great deal of noise around the
planned reduction in Russian defense spending but
what they are missing is that reduction has been
made possible by the spending over the past
couple of years and that the Russian defense
program by 2020 has not been in any way amended,
nevermind reduced. In other words, the Russian
military can afford to use less money for a
couple of years and there will be no cuts in
defense programs as planned by 2020.
Russian public opinion 4/5
In spite of the still strong grip the “IMF-types”
in the Russian government have over the key
economic decisions in Russia there are some signs
that things are getting better and that the
Russian public is getting some of the heads it
wanted to see rolling: here I am, of course,
referring to the arrest of the Minister of
Economic Development of the Russian Federation
Alexei Uliukaev. Of course, the list of
candidates for termination and arrest is much
longer (see here) but Uliukaev was definitely one
of the most influential and toxic member of the
Atlantic Integrationists and the hysterical
reaction of the Russian liberal press clearly
shows how painful this arrest is for the Russian
5th column. As for right now, the arrest of
Uliukaev has not been followed by more sackings
or arrests, but it is quite possible that Putin
did with Uliukaev what he already one did with
Berezovsky: hit at the one “big guy” and
therefore force the rest of his gang to play ball
and give up any hopes of confronting him. Only
time will tell if sacking and arresting Uliukaev
will be enough to finally re-sovereignize Russia,
but it sure is a very good beginning.
Russian russophobes 4/5
Sounds weird, does it not? “Russian russophobes”.
Reminds me of the “self-hating Jew” category. And
yet they exist, at least nominally. I say
nominally because being Russian has never been
about speaking Russian, or about living in Russia
or even about some hypothetical “Russian
ethnicity” (which really does not exist). One
definition of what it is to be Russian was given
by the philosopher Vasilii Rozanov who wrote the
following prophetic words in 1913: “To love a
happy and great Motherland is really not a big
thing. We have to love her when she is weak,
small, humiliated, finally, stupid, finally, even
filled with vices. It is when our “mother” is
drunk, lying and all entangled in her sins that
we must not depart from her. But even that is not
enough: when she finally dies, eaten up by Jews,
and when only her bones remain – he will be truly
“Russian” who will weep over her useless
skeleton, abandoned by all. He truly shall be… ”
Needless to say, Rozanov is hated by the Russian
“liberals”. Contrary to Rozanov, these
russophobic “liberals” rejoice in every Russian
failure and they can barely contain their joy
when some tragedy befalls the Russian people
which they hate and despise for supporting a
“tyrant” like Putin instead of them, the
self-perceived “intellectual elites” of Russia.
When Putin came to power, these 5th russophobic
columnist were literally everywhere since their
families were usually members of the Soviet
elites and since during the infamous 1990s they
literally took control of every single lever of
power in Russia from the mass media to the
Kremlin. First, Putin got rid of the oligarchs,
especially the “Seven Bankers“. Next, he
gradually pushed most of them out from of mass
media (that is when their colleagues and patrons
in the West began speaking of the lack of a free
press in Russia). And then he began the slow and
outright dangerous process of getting rid of
them, one by one, from inside the Russian
government, including the Kremlin. But Putin’s
biggest achievement this year has to be his
extremely successful campaign to delegitimize
this 5th column. He did that no by “cracking
down” on them, nor did he murder any journalist
or opposition figure, and he did not fill the
“new Russian Gulag” with thousands of liberal
dissidents. He (by “he” I mean not only Putin
himself, but also his supporters) did the exact
opposite: he gave them a platform and he made
darn sure that their views would be freely aired
on an almost daily basis. Those interested about
this can read my analysis “Counter-propaganda,
Russian style“. This was pure genius: instead of
silencing the russophobes, Putin gave them a
completely disproportionate amount of airtime
(keep in mind that less than 5% of the Russian
population supports these freaks) and let them
hang themselves by being wrong on just about
everything: they were wrong on Crimea, wrong on
the Ukraine, wrong on the economy, wrong on
social and civil rights, wrong on corruption,
wrong on so-called “gay rights”, wrong about
NATO, wrong about the EU, wrong about Clinton
(they loved her), wrong about Trump (they hated
him), wrong about terrorism and wrong about
Syria. As a result, these “liberals” (in the
Russian meaning of the word) are now universally
seen as traitors, russophobes, snobs, racists,
5th columnists, CIA puppets, etc. They now are
absolutely hated and desperate. As a result,
during the recent elections, we saw the amazing
sight of Russian “liberals”, including Jews,
allying themselves with Nazis and organizing
joint protests against Putin. Needless to say,
that only served to further discredit them.
There are still plenty of 5th columnists in
Russia, but they are mostly laying really low,
hoping for better times and trying to remain out
of the public eye as much as possible. Their main
remaining center of power is the Russian Central
Bank and the “economic bloc” of the Medvedev
government, but since both Kudrin and Uliukavev
have been kicked out, the rest of them are being
very careful in their actions and statements.
All in all, 2016 has been an absolutely
catastrophic year for the russophobic 5th column
which is now in a state of total despair and
which seems to have no future whatsoever.
Syria 5/5
Russia’s success in Syria is nothing short of
amazing. Not only did an extremely small Russian
military force succeed in turning around the
course of the war, but it has held an essentially
indefensible position long enough to deter
Turkey, Saudi Arabia, the Gulf states and the USA
from overtly attacking the Syrian forces or
government. The Russians succeeded in this
despite numerous, ugly and bloody provocations
and despite having to operate in an extremely
hostile environment (the region “belongs” to NATO
and CENTCOM). One of the most amazing successes
what how the Russians managed to save Erdogan in
extremis from a US backed coup and convince him
to work with Russia and Iran to solve the Syrian
crisis. The liberation of Aleppo could not have
happened had Turkey continued to support al-Nusra
& Co at any price. At the very least it would
have taken much more time. By the end of 2016 the
Russians own the Black Sea, control, at least for
the time being, the eastern Mediterranean and
they are working with the three biggest powers on
the ground: the Syrians, of course, but also Iran
and Turkey. As for the United States, they seemed
to have lost the entire region and their only
“achievement”, so to speak, has been to alienate
both the Israelis and the Saudis. As for
President Elect Trump, he has clearly indicated
that his number one priority will be to smash
Daesh & Co. which happens to be exactly what
Russia, Iran and Syria want too. If Trump really
manages to kick the Neocon crazies to the
cockroach filled basement where they belong, we
could see something quite amazing happening: a
joint Russian-US effort to destroy Daesh. The big
problem here will be the totally
counter-productive and, frankly, idiotic
anti-Iranian rhetoric of the Trump campaign.
However, there must be enough good brains around
Trump to make him understand that nothing in the
region can happen without Iran’s approval and
that the US and Iran don’t need to love each
other to agree on a common objective. Trump
strikes me as a realist much more than as an
ideologue. Hopefully, he will learn how to
separate AIPAC-pleasing rhetoric with serious
foreign policy (the crash of the Obama
Administration ought to teach him that lesson).
What is certain is that Russia is now running the
show in Syria and that without US or Turkish
support, Daesh will be facing an existential
crisis. Of course, the situation remains fluid,
complex and dangerous. And I would never put it
past the US or Turkey to do yet another 180 and
to resume their support for Daesh. The Kurdish
factor, Israeli policies and Erdogan’s inherent
unpredictability all serve to make sure that the
Syrian crisis will continue well into 2017.
However, I think that the Neocon’s crazy rampage
is reached is apogee and that things should begin
to improve from now on. Russia alone simply could
not save Syria, and yet she appears to have done just that.
The russophobic hysteria in the West 3/5
There was simply no way that the AngloZionist
could be defeated on all fronts without screaming
“oy veh!” to high heaven and screaming they did.
All year long. Their allegations ranged from
Russia wanting to invade Latvia to Russian
hackers stealing the US election. And to make
absolutely sure that there was no doubt at all as
to the identity of these hackers, the
AngloZionists informed us that these hackers
called themselves “fancy bear” and “cozy bear”,
that they used the alias “Felix Edmundovich” (the
first name and patronymic of Felix Derzhinskii,
the founder of the Soviet secret services) and
that they worked during Moscow time office hours
and they took breaks during Russian holidays. And
least you think that this kind of nonsense was
made up in an mental institution or a
kindergarten, here is the link to the article in
the article in the New York times quoting
“security experts”. Amazing, no? But then again,
when I see the Neocons seriously calling Ron Paul
a Russian agent I realize that there is nothing,
no matter how stupid, that these guys would not
dare say. Chutzpah in action, I suppose. And
while the left side of the Bell Curve appears to
have fully internalized the message, there is a
growing segment of the population which realizes
how silly all these accusations are.
[Personal sidebar: while I am sure that there are
some Americans who believe that the Russkies are
a dangerous enemy of the USA, I have yet to met
even one such American. In my day to day
interactions I see *no* hostility towards
Russians even when I openly speak Russian with my
family in stores or restaurants or when I say
that I am Russian. Maybe this is because I am in
Florida and not New York, but I have yet to see a
single example of anti-Russian hostility].
The Russian treatment by the Western-controlled
WADA at the Rio Olympics was an absolute outrage,
a farce and and crime all wrapped into one. And
Russia is very much to blame for having allowed
the key world organizations become so controlled
by the West. However, let’s also see that the USA
failed to have Russia completely banned from Rio
and that Russian hackers (yes, they do exist)
have uncovered convincing evidence which
discredits WADA and the entire system behind it.
I would call that “growing pains” for the
post-Soviet Russian sport: Russia now needs to
“clean house” in the very real cases of doping
while, at the same time, wrestling the control of
the key international organizations from the
West. A tough task for sure, but Russia has an
immensely powerful ally in this (and many other)
struggles: China. But yes, all in all, the
partial ban and subsequent Russia-bashing campaign is a black eye for Russia.
In the case of Europe, russophobia has always
been a northern European thing. Mediterranean
countries were only dragged into imposing
sanctions under very strong pressure from the
north. It now appears that France will soon be
ruled either by one or the other generally
pro-Russian parties which are competing for the
Presidency. The Brexit took out probably the
single most anti-Russian country in the EU and
now Germany and Poland are more or less on their
own in trying to desperately revitalize the
anti-Russian front. The problem for them is that
they are also both subservient US colonies and
that while they can fancy themselves the next in
line to defend the western civilization against
the revanchist Mongol hordes from the East, the
reality is that they will do whatever the hell Uncle Sam tells them to do.
From now on, the only bastion of true rabid
russophobia will remain in the most thoroughly
“Zionified” segment of society: the media, the
so-called “intellectuals”, the “liberal
interventionists” and all the “tribe of
minorities” who have a beef with Russia on
account of the different civilizational model she
represents (gender differentiated parents,
religion, patriotism (but not nationalism!),
etc.). These will continue to pour a steady
stream of filth against Russia in general and
Putin in particular. Putin will not be their only
target, however, and Donald Trump will be the
recipient of whatever hatred remains after Putin.
Frankly, taking on Putin AND Trump at the same
time is a futile and possibly risky business, no
matter who you are in the AngloZionist “jet set”,
especially when you also have little traction
with the general public whom you have regularly
insulted, demeaned and dismissed.
There could be a gigantic return of the pendulum
happening before our eyes against those who have
produced the lion’s share of the hate-propaganda
in the West: these guys might well end up finally
reaping what they have sown and become the object of hate themselves.
Terrorism 4/5
This year as been tough on Russia. A recent
anonymous comment posted on this blog made a good
list of the tragic murder of Russians this year
including the bombing on the Russian civilian
airliner over Egypt, the Su-24 shootdown
involving US AWACS, the murder of the Russian
medics in a precision strike, the murder of the
Russian Ambassador and the probable murder of the
Red Army Choir. To this list I would add the
Novorussian commanders assassinated in the
Donbass. That is a lot of innocent Russian
victims. But compared to the number of innocent
Syrians or Turks this number is relatively small.
It is outright tiny of compared to the kind of
mass horror the Wahabis managed to organize in
Chechnia. Let’s remember that Russia is a country
at war with state-sponsored transnational
terrorism and that many millions of dollars of
“aid” are going towards the various Nazi and
Wahabi organizations with have the murder of
Russians as their main goal. I would say “so far,
so good” but I cannot do that because I believe
that Russia is still not ready to face the kind
of terrorism which is likely to hit her in the
next year. There is one specific type of target
which is currently completely undefended and
which the terrorists can strike with
quasi-impunity: Russian Orthodox churches outside Russia.
The Russians need to revisit the kind of terror
campaign the Palestinians waged in the 1970s
against the Israelis when they attacked not only
Israeli cultural centers, but also Jewish daycare
centers, schools, and synagogues. Russian
Orthodox churches are now facing the very same
threat including bombings and hostage taking. As
somebody who has attended Russian Orthodox
churches all my life and all over the planet I
know that the number of potential targets are in
the *hundreds* and that they are all completely unprotected.
The Israeli example is crucial here because the
Israelis rapidly realized that they simply could
not count on the local police forces to protect
them. This is why they organized various local
organizations directly attached to a synagogue or
school staffed by volunteers who could do many
very useful and fully legal things to protect
Israeli/Jewish targets such as, for example,
begin to occupy all the parking spaces around a
synagogue 48 hours before any religious holiday
to make sure that no VBIEDs (aka “car bombs”)
could be placed next to the synagogue. There is
*a lot* a well educated group of volunteers can
do to legally protect an exposed civilian target.
They can do even better when they work with the
locals cops and the security specialists at the
embassy. The Russians urgently need to study the
Israeli experience in dealing with a kind of
threat which they will soon face. Remember, the
Palestinians also began by attacking diplomats,
officials and aircraft, but as soon as these
targets were “hardened” they turn to daycare centers, schools and synagogues.
I believe that inside Russia the FSB has a good
control of the situation. But outside Russia the
amount of specialized personnel fully dedicated
to security is woefully inadequate and needs to
be dramatically expanded. During the Soviet era
few government dared to openly attack Soviet
targets, the fearsome (and very much
exaggerated!) reputation of the KGB probably
helped, while during the Eltsin years there
really was no point in attacking Russia as she
was internally collapsing. But now that Russia is
very strong internally, and the Russian military
personnel hard to get at, diplomats, children and
clergy are probably going to be the next targets of the Wahabis.
The one good news about this issue that the the
Soviets/Russians have been fighting the Wahabis
since the 1970s and that they are acutely aware
that there is no such thing as a non-state
sponsored terrorism. The Russians know where the
money, training and weapons come from and they
know that terrorism can only be defeated by
strong counter-intelligence and and intelligence
operations, especially human intelligence. The
foreign intelligence branch of the KGB, the PGU
or First Chief Directorate, had a (very much
deserved) reputation for being able to infiltrate
agents pretty much anywhere, including the top
echelons of the CIA and NSA, and we can be
confident that the SVR today is slowly rebuilding
is capabilities worldwide and, especially, in the
countries which sponsor Wahabi terrorism. Just
the way the Russian special services saved
Erdogan and thereby “flipped” Turkey – one of the
absolutely worst sponsors of Wahabi terrorism –
is already a huge success. God willing, the Saudis will be next.
Conclusion
Simply put – 2016 has been a fantastic year for
Russia. Putin’s policy of slow, low-key and
deliberate move and counter-move has proven to be
extremely effective. While to some “hurray
patriots” it did appear that Putin was being
passive and doing nothing, the outcome of this
year has been a Putin victory on all fronts,
including the most dangerous and difficult ones.
Remember all the nonsense these Putin-haters
wrote about “Putin selling out the Donbass”,
“Putin unable to reply to the Turkish shoot-down
of the SU-24 , “Putin disarming Syria” or “Putin
betraying Assad”? These “hurray patriots” have
been predicted doom and gloom for years now and
they have been proven wrong every single time.
Did that silence them? Somewhat. I notice that
most of the “Putin is selling out the Donbass”
blogs are posting very little and when they do,
it is mostly stuff unrelated to their previous
Putin-bashing campaign. The same goes for the
Ukronazis commentators on sites which allow them
to post: they seem to have thrown in the towel
and given up convincing the world about how
democratic the junta in Kiev is, about how there
are hundreds of Russian tanks in Donetsk and how
the Ukraine will join the EU and become
Germany-like overnight. The only ones who are
keeping up the Putin-bashing campaign are the
western presstitutes, but they are doing that for
pay and to keep their jobs. Besides, that is all
they know how to do anyway. But all in all, there
is a general lack of energy and enthusiasm in the
Russia hating camp which is a real joy for me to see.
2017 could be an amazing year for the world, or
it could be a big disappointment. Right now this
depends mostly on what Trump will do after he
assumes his official capacity. To me the single
most important fact will remain that with Hillary
in the White House our planet risked a major
thermonuclear war. There is no reason any more to
believe that this is going to happen. As for the
list of all the good things which *could* happen
in 2017 if Trump does the right thing for his
country, it will be the topic of a future analysis.
So much emphasis is placed on select Jewish
participation in Bormann companies that when
Adolf Eichmann was seized and taken to Tel Aviv
to stand trial, it produced a shock wave in the
Jewish and German communities of Buenos Aires.
Jewish leaders informed the Israeli authorities
in no uncertain terms that this must never happen
again because a repetition would permanently
rupture relations with the Germans of Latin
America, as well as with the Bormann
organization, and cut off the flow of Jewish
money to Israel. It never happened again, and the
pursuit of Bormann quieted down at the request of
these Jewish leaders. He is residing in an
Argentinian safe haven, protected by the most
efficient German infrastructure in history as
well as by all those whose prosperity depends on his well-being.
<http://l.facebook.com/l.php?u=http%3A%2F%2Fspitfirelist.com%2Fbooks%2Fmartin-bormann-nazi-in-exile%2F&h=eAQErj17O>http://spitfirelist.com/books/martin-bormann-nazi-in-exile/
--
--
Please consider seriously the reason why these elite institutions are not discussed in the mainstream press despite the immense financial and political power they wield?
There are sick and evil occultists running the Western World. They are power mad lunatics like something from a kids cartoon with their fingers on the nuclear button! Armageddon is closer than you thought. Only God can save our souls from their clutches, at least that's my considered opinion - Tony
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"PEPIS" group. Please feel free to forward it to anyone who might be interested
particularly your political representatives, journalists and spiritual leaders/dudes.
To post to this group, send email to pepis@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to pepis-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/pepis?hl=en
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PEPIS" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to pepis+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.