Dan, On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 10:02:43AM -0400, Dan Terpstra wrote: > Having the ability to discriminate based on revision would be a *good > thing*. I'm not particularly fond of the mix-n-match approach taken for > PIII. Although I understand why it's necessary. Is there not some way to > implement a more generic solution through the flags field? I.E. Rev E maps > to flag bit 6. If that bit is set and you aren't Rev E, return error. > That may change some calling semantics, tho...
No, I think that could work especially given that some events are of the kind 'Rev D and later' and not just 'Rev D' only. I would appreciate if someone could send me a complete Rev -> model number mapping table so we could integrate this quickly into libpfm. Thanks. -- -Stephane _______________________________________________ perfmon mailing list [email protected] http://www.hpl.hp.com/hosted/linux/mail-archives/perfmon/
