Will,

SF.net no longer supports nightly tarbal. They instead offer a RSYNC
service.

$ rsync -av rsync://perfmon2.cvs.sourceforge.net/cvsroot/perfmon2/* .

Would that be good enough for you?

On Wed, Sep 05, 2007 at 01:59:23PM -0400, William Cohen wrote:
> Stephane Eranian wrote:
> >Will,
> >
> >On Mon, Aug 20, 2007 at 04:15:36PM -0400, William Cohen wrote:
> >>What architectures has the git kernel been tried on so far? I just built 
> >>the git kernel on an x86-64 machine running FC-6. It doesn't seem to work 
> >>with the current pfmon/libpfm in the cvs, nor earlier ones that I built 
> >>based on 070507 snapshot. Below are the details from running the self 
> >>example and strace with the current cvs code installed on the machine
> >>
> >The kernel works, it's just that syscall numbers have changed yet
> >again and I have not yet pushed the update to libpfm CVS.
> >
> >Use the perfmon.h attached to this E-mail.
> >Copy it to libpfm/include/perfmon/perfmon.h
> >
> >--
> >-Stephane
> 
> Hi Stephane,
> 
> Is there going to be a snapshot libpfm tarball posted with the correct 
> __NR_pfm_create_context constant in perfmon.h? Right now the cvs is the 
> only place with the correct values for the syscalls.
> 
> -Will

-- 

-Stephane
_______________________________________________
perfmon mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.hpl.hp.com/hosted/linux/mail-archives/perfmon/

Reply via email to