Chris Wilson wrote: > On Sun, 2009-02-22 at 11:46 +0100, Anders Norgaard wrote: >> Behdad asked here and on his blog[1] for a python version of bootchart >> that would be hackable and extendable for more startup profiling >> tasks. >> >> Now Henning Niss and I have such a port in a working state. The code >> has been reduced from ~3k to ~1k SLOC in the port to python. >> >> http://code.google.com/p/pybootchartgui/ >> >> It reads the same files as the original bootchart and it has been >> tested on Ubuntu and Fedora. >> >> We happily accept feature requests and patches. > > That does look good, and it looks like it should be complementary to > using sysprof for inspecting whole-system activity. So how difficult > will it be to extend sysprof to both capture and display the same > information? I'm hoping that with the tracing frameworks being developed > within the kernel, we can now access all the profiling information > without additional modules, and so it should just be a matter of > integration. (I'm aiming for understatement of the year ;-)
I have been thinking along the same lines. With systemtap user-space probing finally arriving, there's a lot of opportunities that we need to explore. behdad > cc'ing Soeren for his opinion. > -ickle > > _______________________________________________ > Performance-list mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/performance-list > _______________________________________________ Performance-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/performance-list
