Ralf Corsepius (rc040...@freenet.de) said: 
> >Some languages are distributed for x86_64 with both variant
> >e.g. tcl, because some libraries doesn't work with x86_64
> >interpreter. We didn't ship perl-5.8.8 for both archs and I don't
> >know about any reason why it changed.

We certainly did ship earlier perl for both arches; check the F7-F12
releases. (Have't checked earlier, but it's been there forever.)

> >I file a ticket for rel-eng: https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/3695
> 
> OK, I realize this ticked was closed immediately.

It stems from the attached. It may not make sense now that libperl is
separate; at the time, it wasn't.

Bill
>From fedora-maintainers-boun...@redhat.com Mon Apr 23 15:56:51 2007
Return-Path: <fedora-maintainers-boun...@redhat.com>
Received: from nostromo.devel.redhat.com (nostromo.devel.redhat.com [127.0.0.1])
        by nostromo.devel.redhat.com (8.14.1/8.13.7) with ESMTP id 
l3NJuoQs017220
        for <nott...@localhost>; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 15:56:51 -0400
Received: from pobox.devel.redhat.com [10.11.255.8]
        by nostromo.devel.redhat.com with IMAP (fetchmail-6.3.7)
        for <nott...@localhost> (single-drop); Mon, 23 Apr 2007 15:56:51 -0400 
(EDT)
Received: from pobox.devel.redhat.com ([unix socket])
         by pobox.devel.redhat.com (Cyrus v2.2.12-Invoca-RPM-2.2.12-3.RHEL4.1) 
with LMTPA;
         Mon, 23 Apr 2007 15:58:54 -0400
X-Sieve: CMU Sieve 2.2
Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254])
        by pobox.devel.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id l3NJwsqs014472;
        Mon, 23 Apr 2007 15:58:54 -0400
Received: from mx1.util.phx.redhat.com (mx1.util.phx.redhat.com [10.8.4.92])
        by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id l3NJwnJc029459;
        Mon, 23 Apr 2007 15:58:49 -0400
Received: from hormel.redhat.com (hormel.util.phx.redhat.com [10.8.4.111])
        by mx1.util.phx.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id l3NJwhUM009863;
        Mon, 23 Apr 2007 15:58:43 -0400
Received: from listman.util.phx.redhat.com (listman.util.phx.redhat.com 
[10.8.4.110])
        by hormel.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP
        id 759E672E5F; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 15:58:43 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com
        [172.16.52.254])
        by listman.util.phx.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id
        l3NJwfBp011275 for <fedora-maintain...@listman.util.phx.redhat.com>;
        Mon, 23 Apr 2007 15:58:42 -0400
Received: from devserv.devel.redhat.com (devserv.devel.redhat.com
        [172.16.58.1])
        by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id l3NJwfcn029451;
        Mon, 23 Apr 2007 15:58:41 -0400
Received: from vpn-248-105.boston.redhat.com (vpn-248-105.boston.redhat.com
        [10.13.248.105])
        by devserv.devel.redhat.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id
        l3NJwd6I027490; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 15:58:41 -0400
From: Jesse Keating <jkeat...@redhat.com>
Organization: Red Hat
To: fedora-maintain...@redhat.com
Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 15:54:01 -0400
User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6
References: <462a6a23.5030...@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <462a6a23.5030...@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <200704231554.02102.jkeat...@redhat.com>
X-loop: fedora-maintain...@redhat.com
Cc: 
Subject: Re: Spilt libperl from perl
X-BeenThere: fedora-maintain...@redhat.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: junk
Reply-To: List for Fedora Package Maintainers <fedora-maintain...@redhat.com>
List-Id: List for Fedora Package Maintainers <fedora-maintainers.redhat.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers>, 
        <mailto:fedora-maintainers-requ...@redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-maintainers>
List-Post: <mailto:fedora-maintain...@redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:fedora-maintainers-requ...@redhat.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers>, 
        <mailto:fedora-maintainers-requ...@redhat.com?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0458426581=="
Sender: fedora-maintainers-boun...@redhat.com
Errors-To: fedora-maintainers-boun...@redhat.com
Status: RO
Content-Length: 2432

--===============0458426581==
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart5029883.VGjPY9CStv";
        protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

--nextPart5029883.VGjPY9CStv
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

On Saturday 21 April 2007 15:46:43 Warren Togami wrote:
> During the last FESCO meeting there was (reluctant?) agreement that
> splitting libperl.so from perl would be a better solution to workaround
> our broken multilib policy than to split perl sub-packages out of
> everything that breaks due to perl.i386 being removed from F7 x86-64.
>
> Is this going to happen?

Ok, this is my huge mistake.  Here is what happened.

In FC6, perl was multilib because gaim brought it in during tree builds.  G=
aim=20
being multilib.

Recently, gaim went away and pidgin showed up in Extras.  All of a sudden,=
=20
nothing brought in perl to be multilib.  I mistakenly assumed that perl had=
=20
never been multilib and things were just noticing.  We had big discussions=
=20
around perl/gaim and multilib around FC6 release time and I forgot the=20
outcome, and I simply was an idiot and didn't look at the FC6 tree, which=20
clearly shows perl was multilib.

To resolve this, I have added perl to a "whitelist" to force it to be multi=
lib=20
again, since pidgin isn't in core to pull it in.  This will resolve all the=
se=20
broken deps for Fedora 7, without making further drastic changes to the per=
l=20
package.

Perl should once again be multilib with tonight's rawhide.

This problem wouldn't have come up had we already been merged, since pidgin=
=20
would be available during the compose, depsolved, and brought in the perl=20
multilib.

=2D-=20
Jesse Keating
Release Engineer: Fedora

--nextPart5029883.VGjPY9CStv
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBGLQ7a4v2HLvE71NURAvsvAKCS7TYtmuXCzAzjiciFlVDXKULuTACgwsI/
zCPLqy5vnAVuSwHL9ycwtck=
=sc9d
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--nextPart5029883.VGjPY9CStv--


--===============0458426581==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

--
Fedora-maintainers mailing list
fedora-maintain...@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers

--===============0458426581==--


--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

Reply via email to