https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1307195
Paul Howarth <p...@city-fan.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Flags|needinfo?(p...@city-fan.org |
|) |
--- Comment #7 from Paul Howarth <p...@city-fan.org> ---
(In reply to Petr Pisar from comment #6)
> Any reason why to run-require IPC::Run? IPC::Cmd uses IPC::Open3 on
> non-Windows instead. See the BEGIN section in IPC::Cmd:
>
> $USE_IPC_RUN = IS_WIN32 && !IS_WIN98;
> $USE_IPC_OPEN3 = not IS_VMS;
If someone sets the variable $IPC::Cmd::USE_IPC_RUN then IPC::Run is preferred,
as per the documentation "HOW IT WORKS". Clearly it's not the default though,
so I can see the argument for not including it, or perhaps relegating it to a
"Suggests:". I don't think it's a big dependency anyway though, probably only
pulling in IO::Tty as an extra dependency.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
