On Thu, Mar 05, 2020 at 10:22:40PM +0100, Emmanuel Seyman wrote: > A while back, a few of us went through a mad rush to get our packages in > EPEL. This lead to a number of situations where the main maintainer of a > package didn't want to maintain the EPEL8 version of his package and we > had to wait for a proven-packager to push to the branch. > Interesting. I did not know that a proven packager can bypass the request-branch request check that requires the person the be in admin(?) list of the package.
Recently some had a similar issue. Effectively packagers willing to maintain EPEL packages cannot do it because of a lack of Fedora maintainer's blessing. > I'ld like to propose we create a perl-packagers-sig group so that we can > have non-proven packagers being able to git push. > Do you mean a Pagure group <https://src.fedoraproject.org/groups/>? I thought we already have perl-sig group for sending the notifications. Is that a differnt class of groups? I would prefer shorter "perl-sig" group name. I'm not against, but I agree with Paul that it will hit the silent wall again. -- Petr
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
