https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2230255
Emmanuel Seyman <emman...@seyman.fr> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |emman...@seyman.fr
--- Comment #9 from Emmanuel Seyman <emman...@seyman.fr> ---
(In reply to Artem S. Tashkinov from comment #8)
>
> Why would a package showing docs need a HTTP client?
It is possible (and documented) to run "perldoc URL".
See https://metacpan.org/dist/Pod-Perldoc/source/lib/Pod/Perldoc.pm#L271
> Is the HTTP client really needed or it could be made optional?
I do not see Pod::Perldoc handling gracefully the fact that HTTP::Tiny is not
installed.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2230255
Report this comment as SPAM:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202230255%23c9
--
_______________________________________________
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
