https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=836835

--- Comment #3 from pcpa <paulo.cesar.pereira.de.andr...@gmail.com> ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> (In reply to comment #0)
> > I found some bug reports after some googling about issues with pari-2.5,
> > and, when attempting to convert Pari.xs to pari-2.5 api it got too much
> > confusing due to internal api changes.
> > 
> > Since perl-Math-Pari should be the only showstopper of pari-2.5 update, I
> > believe it should be ok to build perl's Pari.so with an internal pari
> > implementation without depending on system pari.
> > 
> > I agree this is somewhat hackish, but I believe better than creating a
> > pari23 package.
> 
> On the other hand, that would require a library bundling exemption from
> FESCO, which might not be granted. The libpari23 package I have ready would
> not require that, you could review it and once it's in place we could then
> update pari to 2.5.1 without breaking anything.
> 
> If I submit the libpari23 package for review, will you review it?

  Yes, I will review it!

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

Reply via email to