Said Nicholas Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > I thought we'd managed to twist Mark's arm sufficiently that he was going > to include DynaLoader. If he doesn't, the I agree with you. > "This is perl. But you can't add any compiled extensions to it" wouldn't be > perl as we know it.
Yes. I agree that base-perl should have the Dynaloader. In fact, I have a local, heavily stripped down build that builds a sort-of base-perl (with no docs). Lemme polish it up a bit, and lets see what the rest of the FreeBSD community have to say. M -- o Mark Murray \_ O.\_ Warning: this .sig is umop ap!sdn
