Would someone unfix this? ----- Forwarded message from Philip Newton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -----
Subject: Re: PERFORCE change 13084 for review From: Philip Newton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2001 09:50:58 +0100 Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jarkko Hietaniemi) Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Organization: very little In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> On Sun, 18 Nov 2001 14:45:06 -0800, in perl.perl5.changes you wrote: > --- perl/pod/perlfaq4.pod.~1~ Sun Nov 18 14:45:06 2001 > +++ perl/pod/perlfaq4.pod Sun Nov 18 14:45:06 2001 > @@ -1852,7 +1849,7 @@ > > =head2 How can I use a reference as a hash key? > > -You can't do this directly, but you could use the standard Tie::RefHash > +You can't do this directly, but you could use the standard Tie::Refhash > module distributed with Perl. > > =head1 Data: Misc > End of Patch. This is what Germans call "eine Verschlimmbesserung" -- trying to make things better but making them worse in the process. Tie::RefHash is correct. IIRC, this was patched fairly recently -- and apparently in the wrong place (or in not enough places) and so it got overwritten with old, bad data. Cheers, Philip ----- End forwarded message ----- -- $jhi++; # http://www.iki.fi/jhi/ # There is this special biologist word we use for 'stable'. # It is 'dead'. -- Jack Cohen
