On Mon, Oct 08, 2001 at 08:22:50AM -0600, Nathan Torkington wrote: > Chris Fedde writes: > > There was some comment on clmp that this code was confusing because > > of the variable name. Personally I'm not much in favor of Hungarian > > notation. But for basic stuff maybe it's best. > > I like the change. It makes sense to use 'arrayref' and not 'array' > for a variable that holds an array reference :-) We did that in the > Cookbook where there wasn't any other meaningful name to be used for > variables.
I don't really like the change. What else could a variable '$array' be, than a reference to an anonymous array? The sigil *does* carry information - just like Larry intended it. Abigail
