In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Nathan Torkington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sean M. Burke writes: > > This "upon request" business is an annoyance. It should be replaced by > > either the "simple proof", or a URL to the simple proof (neither of which I > > have on hand, or I would supply a patch). > There's a longer explanation in the Cookbook you're welcome to crib, > but if you're going for "give them the answer and get out of their > faces" then by all means just drop all references to the proof. my Cookbook is somewhere in New York, so if somebody would like to update this answer with a reference or an explanation, i'll update the FAQ. :)
