_brian_d_foy wrote: > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Robert Spier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>should we hook this up to 'perldoc -q'? unless someone else is working on >>>it, i'll write the script. >>Maybe a seperate perlfaq script? I'm not sure what the value of this is >>if we have a search facility. > it can be the search thingy until we decide we've found something better. > maybe just the find dialog in the browser is okay.
Oh, I see what you mean. A perldoc -q -> html thingy. That would be cool. >>> * a search facility >>Will a restricted google search be good enough? > probably not, but maybe. Google isn't POD aware, and perldoc is.\ See above. >>> * a list of alternate resources in case the faq didn't help >> >>This should be part of the FAQ. ;) > but we can't put it in every answer, and the more ways we direct people > to other resources, the more likely they'll be directed at other resources. :) Well, there could be an expanded "Other Resources" section at the end or some such. >>> * a list of alternate resources on a per-question basis (i.e. additional reading) >>This should be embedded in the FAQ somehow. > maybe. we have other chickens to hatch first. :) Cluck! Cluck! -R
