On Wed, 28 Aug 2002 22:56:37 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (_brian_d_foy) wrote:
> + require v5.6; # our() did not exist before that Shouldn't one use "require 5.006;" instead? After all, "v5.6" syntax is going to do something weird on older Perls -- and if you don't care about that, then you might as well just let the compiler choke on "our" rather than "v5.6", no? I'm not sure what purpose a line such as "require v5.6" serves, since it is interpretable correctly only by versions which satisfy its requirement anyway. Cheers, Philip
