At 06:31 PM 8/26/02 -0400, Chen, Allen wrote:
>I'm not sure this is the right list to be posting this too, but it seems to
>be the most appropriate one that I can find.  I'm having a problem with the
>new ithreads in 5.8.  Actually, it sounds  similar to the problem mentioned
>in the previous thread about the simple program that segfaults when trying
>to join 200 trivial threads.
>
>In my application, I launch off a variable number of threads running the
>same subroutine.  At some point in the program, I loop through and join all
>of these threads.  Regardless of the number of threads spawned, the program
>segfaults when it gets to the very last thread.  I've tried changing the
>order by which I join them and I still have the same problem--it doesn't
>segfault until I get to the last remaining thread.  Here's a dump of the
>errors I get:
>
>Attempt to free non-existent shared string ':p5' during global destruction.
>Attempt to free non-existent shared string ':p3' during global destruction.
>Attempt to free non-existent shared string ':p1' during global destruction.
>Attempt to free non-existent shared string ':p4' during global destruction.
>Attempt to free non-existent shared string ':p2' during global destruction.
>Unbalanced string table refcount: (1) for "DESTROY" during global
>destruction.
>Scalars leaked: -11
>Segmentation fault
>
>Do any of you have any insight on these errors and what I might do to
>prevent them?  There's very little documentation that I can find on the new
>threads, so I'm really at a loss.  Any help would be greatly appreciated.
>
>If this is the wrong list to be posting to, I apologize.  If you could point
>me to a more appropriate one, I would appreciate that, too.

If you are running on a x86 system, have you tried installing valgrind and 
running this test through it, preferably with a version of perl that has 
debugging enabled?

Valgrind is an open source memory checker, available from:

   http://developer.kde.org/~sewardj/

If you can't or don't want to do this, you could send me the code off-list 
and have me run it to see what is going wrong.


Liz

Reply via email to