Chris Ridd wrote:

The only objection I'd have to this is that they're non-standard and
proprietary controls. All the other ones we include are from RFCs, or from
Internet drafts that are intended to become RFCs.

So I'd personally prefer if they were in a separate CPAN module for that
reason. Maybe there are other CPAN modules for MAD?

I read the Microsoft draft. I still agree with Chris.

--
mike

Reply via email to