On Mon, Jan 31, 2000 at 11:25:11AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > Watching of watchers sounds really interesting!
> >
> > Oh? Would you use it like an extra timeout?
>
> For a single watcher, a simple timeout would surely have the same effect. But if
>there would be a watcher
> grouping feature (as you indicated), watching groups of watchers could provide a new
>dimension of
> flexibility. Not that I looked for that, but now that you foretold it it seems to be
>interesting.
Hm... maybe inactivity watchers should work like this.
> On the other hand, as I expressed before, introducing a group feature could (from my
>point of view) imply
> new difficulties. Could a watcher belong to more than exactly one group, for example?
I don't see any insurmountable problems. I'll put it on the TODO list.
--
"Never ascribe to malice that which can be explained by stupidity."
via, but not speaking for Deutsche Bank
