Joshua N Pritikin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>On Mon, Feb 07, 2000 at 09:40:24PM +0000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>Don't worry, it can be argued in either direction. C<min> could be the
>minimum amount of time between events or the minimum amount of time to
>sit idle. My opinion is that either interpretation is equally
>intuitive, meaning that no matter which way it works people will get it
>wrong 50% of the time. Can you make a solid case for either
>interpretation?
No, but you could slant the expectaction by renaming min_wait or max_idle ;-)
(Or is that max_wait or min_idle ?)
Just make the docs spell it out is enough...
--
Nick Ing-Simmons
