On Tue, Dec 05, 2000 at 09:28:29PM +0000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Joshua N Pritikin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >OK. Does anyone oppose changing the C callback from:
> >
> >(* (void(*)(void*,pe_event*)) ev->callback)(ev->ext_data, ev);
> >
> >To:
> >
> >(* (void(*)(pe_event*,void*)) ev->callback)(ev, ev->ext_data);
> >
> >?
>
> I prefer the latter - it makes it more method-call-like.
i'll count that as a vote *for* the binary incompatible change. For
what it's worth, i decided to change the prototype to:
(* (void(*)(pe_event*)) ev->callback)(ev);
After all, ext_data is already available via ev->ext_data, if needed,
and if the callback doesn't need ext_data then there is a *slight*
performance gain. ;-)
--
May the best description of competition prevail.
(via, but not speaking for Deutsche Bank)
