On Thu, Aug 30, 2001 at 01:05:35PM -0400, Joe McMahon wrote:
> I've switched over to using is() for anything that wasn't an '=='
> test' on funky numeric values; there are a lot of those in (e.g.)
> bop.t, and I didn't want to change the fundamental nature of the
> tests. I've also gotten my diff format right this time. :)
>
> So here are:
> - avhv.t
> - bop.t
> - chars.t
> - closure.t (only a short patch; I wasn't up to rewriting all of Tom's
> code. It does remove the print "not " stuff, though)
> - concat.t
> - defins.t
> - delete.t
> - die.t (this looked nasty to switch to Test::More. so I just fixed the
> prints)
> - die_exit.t (similar to die.t)
Hmmm. concat.t is waaaay too basic to use Test::More on it. delete.t
is pushing it. die.t and die_exit.t cannot be tested with Test::More
since it relies on that functionality.
> Still working my way through t/op; hope to have more later today.
Ok. Let me run through t/op and give you a list of what's safe to use
Test::More on and what's not. Let you know in a bit.
--
Michael G. Schwern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.pobox.com/~schwern/
Perl6 Quality Assurance <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Kwalitee Is Job One
You know. I still feel good about my ancestors' land.
--Alex Chiu, Immortality Guy
