Re: v0.3 [Was: CPAN Upload: R/RB/RBS/Test-Differences-0.2.tar.gz]

[chromatic]

On Sat, 15 Dec 2001 07:10:33 -0700, Barrie Slaymaker wrote:

> How about having Test::More use eq_or_diff_data() in is_deeply() if it cane
> eval "use Test::Differences;" and use it's current routine if it can't? That's
> as seamless as you can get.

Wild idea:

        How about splitting out the error-reporting, with a nice default in
Test::Builder or wherever, using optional modules if possible?

        use Test::More
                tests => 100,
                report => Test::Differences;

-- c