On Wed, 19 Dec 2001 10:04:17 -0700, Tels wrote: > First, ok() is no no longer ok(), but is now is(), because ok() is no longer > ok to use with ok($this,$that); but is() is ok with $that. And then there is > isnt(), isn't it? Not to speak of the use of can_ok(), which you can use, ok? > isnt() $that ok() with you? $that should pass() ok() & be ! like() $this > fail() function I've heard about. I'll better skip() some releases until it > is() ok() to use Test::More without() going insane().[0] You just hurt my eyes, and I've read Slashcode.
If you wrote up your experiences, perhaps it'd make a good article or tutorial on converting an existing test suite to Test::More. -- c
