On Tue, Dec 17, 2002 at 11:35:38AM +0000, Adrian Howard wrote: > Ah. Confusion of vocab. You're talking about the order of the test > scripts rather than the order of tests run by those scripts. Yes?
Ah, Yes. > I think Tony was talking about the order of tests. OK. I think I'm hampered by never having used Test::Class. But I suspect that the same technique could be used within Test::Class if desired. In any case, it seems that sometimes the decision to add tests to an existing script or to create a new script is sometimes fairly arbitrary. > While key test scripts tend to be run earlier in some setups, I'm not > sure that's it going to be a useful distinction all of the time. There > are certainly lots of test setups where it's not true for me. Agreed. It was really just a half baked idea of mine that may or may not have any practical benefit in the future :-) -- Paul Johnson - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.pjcj.net
