Michael G Schwern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Oct 02, 2001 at 04:21:17PM -0500, Dave Rolsky wrote: >> On Tue, 2 Oct 2001, Michael G Schwern wrote: >> >> > Any particularly good reason we're showing all that "PERL_DL_NONLAZY" >> > noise as part of "make test"? What about just: >> >> I do some weird stuff with that piece to pass data around to my tests. > > You capture the output of 'make test' and manipuate that line > directly?? Eek! No, he(/we) override(s) the 'make test' command, and for informational purposes wants to see the modified command when running 'make test'. -Ken
- Re: Supressing "make test" jibber-jabber Michael G Schwern
- Re: Supressing "make test" jibber-jabber H . Merijn Brand
- Re: Supressing "make test" jibber-jabber Tels
- Re: Supressing "make test" jibber-jabber Dave Rolsky
- Re: Supressing "make test" jibber-jabber Ken Williams
- Re: Supressing "make test" jibber-jabber Michael G Schwern
- Re: Supressing "make test" jibber-jabber Nick Ing-Simmons
- Re: Supressing "make test" jibber-jabber Michael G Schwern
- Re: Supressing "make test" jibber-jabber Tels
- Re: Supressing "make test" jibber-jabber Ken Williams
- Re: Supressing "make test" jibber-jabber Dave Rolsky
- Re: Supressing "make test" jibber-jabber Tels
- Re: Supressing "make test" jibber-jabber H . Merijn Brand