--- Michael G Schwern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [... and the shears went snip, snip, ker-snip ...] > #B::Bytecode [module broken, can't test] > #B::C [ditto] > #B::CC [ditto ditto] > #B::Concise [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > #B::Disassembler [Wolfgang Laun] > #B::Lint [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > #B::Stackobj [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > #B::Xref [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Byteloader
Byteloader is untestable without a working B::Bytecode (we have no way of generating input files for it. Anyway, Byteloader/B::Bytecode are actually speed _losses_, so IMHO they should probably simply be killed - they're just wasted space in the distribution. (IIRC, I was the last person to seriously hack on them.) And if they get removed from the core, they obviously don't need tests ;-). > CPAN > # CPAN::FirstTime [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] in progress > Dynaloader What sort of test does Dynaloader need? If dynaloading doesn't work, no dynamic extensions (Socket, Fcntl, IO, POSIX, ...) will work, and the errors they'll spew are pretty obviously loading problems. -- BKD __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Send your FREE holiday greetings online! http://greetings.yahoo.com
