Jim Cromie wrote: > > Well, it seems Ive been abusing diag() for some time now :-O > > Is there a 'right' way to do this ? perhaps just using ok() ?
ok() goes to stdout by default, diag() to stderr > or maybe a new function, ex: note() is better: > > note......................................ok# YOUR INFORMATIONAL > MESSAGE HERE if that goes to stdout, that won't appear in the default harness output > Since Ive been using diag() to denote groups of tests, > which separates chunks of foo ................. ok, > But this appears to be precisely what RGS doesnt like. Or use separate .t files ? > Hence ive UPCASEd the note to give it some of the visual distinction > that I got from diag(), hopefully w/o the annoyance. > > Is this worthwhile ? If so, Ill work up a patch
