Andy Lester <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

>>>>     http://www.petdance.com/random/tap.html
> Everyone: I still need more comments.  Pete Krawczyk's the only one to
> provide complaints yet.

@ Test number

    1..6
    not ok
    ok
    not ok
    ok
    ok

will generate

    FAILED tests 1, 3, 6

Would it be possible (useful?) to refine this to

    FAILED tests 1, 3
    MISSING tests 6

-- Johan

Reply via email to