Andy Lester <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >>>> http://www.petdance.com/random/tap.html > Everyone: I still need more comments. Pete Krawczyk's the only one to > provide complaints yet.
@ Test number 1..6 not ok ok not ok ok ok will generate FAILED tests 1, 3, 6 Would it be possible (useful?) to refine this to FAILED tests 1, 3 MISSING tests 6 -- Johan