--- Michael G Schwern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > ok defined *::is_code{CODE},
> > '&is_code should be exported to our namespace';
>
> I usually do this with can_ok()
>
> can_ok( __PACKAGE__, qw(is_code isnt_code) );
I specifically avoid that with methods because &can_ok provides a
default description which implies a method call. If I'm testing a
function, not a method, the default description is misleading.
> is_code() is a sucky name as it more says to me "is this code" not
> "is X
> routine the same as Y routine". You know this, but I thought I'd
> kick off the discussion here.
Agreed. I think eq_code is better.
Cheers,
Ovid
--
If this message is a response to a question on a mailing list, please send
follow up questions to the list.
Web Programming with Perl -- http://users.easystreet.com/ovid/cgi_course/
