* Ovid <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-04-19 07:20]: > What if someone wants more diagnostic information or more > complete failure information? We might find things useful > enough that that we feel compelled to update TAP. If so, TAP > needs to be versioned and we need to figure out how to > accomodate that.
Hmm, has anyone else ever designed an extensible, versioned plaintext protocol before, maybe? :-) Just think of TAP as a wire protocol. Then most questions just disappear. There is also have a very large body of prior art to consult. Regards, -- Aristotle Pagaltzis // <http://plasmasturm.org/>
