----- Original Message ---- > From: Nik Clayton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Ovid wrote: > > I'm perfectly comfortable with this idea, but what I'm trying to figure > > out then, is the namespace for my parser. It's a TAP parser, after all. > > Any suggestions? I see that Adam has suggested a TAPx:: namespace, > > but there could still be competing TAPx::Parser modules. Don't know if > > that would bug folks, though. > TAPx::<CPANID>::Parser Thought about that, but immediately discarded it. TAPx::OVID::Parser doesn't say anything about the parser other than authorship and the latter is verified by glancing at the docs. My jumping on the TAPx::Parser namespace is almost as bad as my taking TAP::Parser, so I'm just trying to figure out how to truly distinguish my (currently incomplete) parser from others. I suspect it will be as arbitrary as your idea, though :) How about TAPx::PerlOrArtisticLicense::Parser? :) Cheers, Ovid -- If this message is a response to a question on a mailing list, please send follow up questions to the list. Web Programming with Perl -- http://users.easystreet.com/ovid/cgi_course/
