Hi! I had some time recently and added some first META.yml checking to CPANTS (with the help of Gabor Szabo):
metayml_is_parsable metayml_has_license metayml_conforms_spec metayml_has_license now indictes whether there's a computer readable license in META.yml, while (the also new metric) has_humanreadable_license does some where basic guessing if there's a human-readable license (LICENSE file or pod-section). metayml_conforms_spec currently very much busts the CPANTS game. I'm checking if the files comply to META.yml spec 1.2. Most don't, because they seem to use 1.0 Should I switch to 1.0-checking? I'va also added graphs: - per author, plotting number of dists and average kwalitee over time: http://cpants.perl.org/author/DOMM - per dist, plotting kwalitee over time: http://cpants.perl.org/kwalitee/Module-CPANTS-Analyse -- #!/usr/bin/perl http://domm.zsi.at for(ref bless{},just'another'perl'hacker){s-:+-$"-g&&print$_.$/}
