On 21 Jan 2007, at 13:36, demerphq wrote:
I dont get this logic.
Why cant something that wants to monitor the test process do something
other than make test?
They can do a make, and or make test-prep or whatever, and then call
into an alternative test harness framework to monitor the tests.
Can you explain why this is a no-go in more detail?
I'm sure that's possible but I like the simplicity of Adam's proposal
to just dump raw TAP into a file and then feed it back into
TAPx::Parser for subsequent analysis. Is there anything wrong with
that picture?
--
Andy Armstrong, hexten.net
