--- Shlomi Fish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Replying to myself I'd like to note that from my analysis at least
> the
> bignum test failed because of the following code in the new
> TAPx::Parser:
>
> <<<<<<<<<
> sub is_ok {
> my $self = shift;
>
> return if $self->is_unplanned; # <-----------
>
> # TODO directives reverse the sense of a test.
> return $self->has_todo ? 1 : $self->ok !~ /not/;
> }
This does appear to be a bug. I know how it came about and I'm looking
at how to get around it. Thanks for the heads up.
Cheers,
Ovid
--
Buy the book -- http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/perlhks/
Perl and CGI -- http://users.easystreet.com/ovid/cgi_course/
