On 3/7/07, Adrian Howard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 5 Mar 2007, at 22:30, Ovid wrote:
> (Resent from the address I've actually subscribed from!)
>
> Hi all,
>
> Per an email from Schwern, he does not object to renaming TAPx::Parser
> to TAP::Parser. Hence, we have an official 'blessing' from him for
> claiming this namespace. Does anyone have any thoughts/objections to
> this? I realize that enough people are using TAPx::Parser that it
> might be a tiny speed bump for some, but I can't see any major
> difficulties here.
>
> Any concerns/objections?
Nope.
Also fine by me, as Test::Run only uses TAPx::Parser on a small number
of places.
Regards,
Shlomi Fish
Adrian
--
------------------------------------------
Shlomi Fish http://www.shlomifish.org/
If his programming is anything like his philosophising, he
would find 10 imaginary bugs in the "Hello World" program.
