Fergal Daly wrote: > Did group 1 produce 2 tests and group 2 produce 3 or was it the other > way around?
Why is that important to know? > Worse, > > ok 1 > ok 2 > ok 3 > ... > ok 1001 > 1..1000 > > where did my extra test come from? That's something the TAP producer can tell us, right now. No TAP extension necessary. Its even better than relying on TAP groups because it will work in any test, it doesn't rely on your having small groups. TB patch welcome. > Finally, this allows you to fork a process to run a block with no > prior knowledge of how many tests are going to happen inside the > forked process, not a killer app but it might be useful for people who > have tests involving lots of network latency, they could run in > parallel. I see, with the groups being independent of each other in ordering now. That is handy.
