--- "A. Pagaltzis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The question is, do we need that flexibility? As far as I can > tell, datetimes in TAP would almost always denote instants in > time, not durations nor long-duration recurring events, and it > will always be easy to come up with the current month and > day-in-month.
Thanks for reminding me. Another bit of meta-information that should be optionally supported in the TAP YAML output is "duration". If one's comparing the behavior of a test suite over time, some might find it beneficial to know that they've added 10% more tests but increased the time it takes to run those tests by 300%. Of course, this is a *very* sketchy metric and not one I would be too keen on relying on, but some might value it. Cheers, Ovid -- Buy the book - http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/perlhks/ Perl and CGI - http://users.easystreet.com/ovid/cgi_course/ Personal blog - http://publius-ovidius.livejournal.com/ Tech blog - http://use.perl.org/~Ovid/journal/
