# from David Cantrell
# on Tuesday 11 September 2007 04:10 am:
>On Mon, Sep 10, 2007 at 04:37:51PM -0700, Eric Wilhelm wrote:
>> # from David Cantrell
>>
>> # on Monday 10 September 2007 02:22 pm:
>> >And in any case, I prefer to run Makefile.PL to Build.PL, as I find
>> >ExtUtils::MakeMaker to be far more reliable than Module::Build.
>> > Most testers don't do that, so I figure that by doing so I'm
>> > smoking out another potential source of bugs.
>>
>> It seems to be the opposite of that. Are any testers using
>> Build.PL?
>
>Most of 'em use CPANPLUS, and I thought that that preferred Build.PL.
That doesn't seem to be the case.
s reconfigure
6
...
Prefer Makefile.PL over Build.PL? [Y/n]:
Are any testers using Build.PL?
--Eric
--
software: a hypothetical exercise which happens to compile.
---------------------------------------------------
http://scratchcomputing.com
---------------------------------------------------
