On Wed, 24 Oct 2007 12:36:47 +0100, Andy Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> On 24 Oct 2007, at 12:13, H.Merijn Brand wrote:
> > pc09:/pro/3gl/CPAN/perl-current/t 138 > env HARNESS_TIMER=time ./ 
> > TEST op/ver.t
> > t/op/ver....ok 12:18:46
> 
> Now (as of r736 from http://svn.hexten.net/tapx/trunk) the output  
> looks like this:
> 
> [12:34] andy $ prove -rb --timer
> [12:34:45] t/000-load..............1/2 # Testing HTML::Tiny 0.905
> [12:34:45] t/000-load..............ok       27 ms
> [12:34:45] t/010-simple............ok       41 ms
> [12:34:46] t/020-coverage..........ok      306 ms
> [12:34:46] t/030-tags..............ok       34 ms
> [12:34:46] t/040-lazy..............ok       31 ms
> [12:34:46] t/050-validate_tag......ok       28 ms
> All tests successful.
> Files=6, Tests=1151,  1 wallclock secs ( 0.15 usr  0.04 sys +  0.41  
> cusr  0.05 csys =  0.65 CPU)
> Result: PASS
> 
> Is that OK?

Yes. much appreciated.
Please also try to make t/TEST in sync with this new feature :)
Maybe even add a comment line in the first 10 lines of t/TEST that
mentions these possibilities

-- 
H.Merijn Brand         Amsterdam Perl Mongers (http://amsterdam.pm.org/)
using & porting perl 5.6.2, 5.8.x, 5.10.x  on HP-UX 10.20, 11.00, 11.11,
& 11.23, SuSE 10.1 & 10.2, AIX 5.2, and Cygwin.       http://qa.perl.org
http://mirrors.develooper.com/hpux/            http://www.test-smoke.org
                        http://www.goldmark.org/jeff/stupid-disclaimers/

Reply via email to