On 30 Nov 2007, at 00:51, chromatic wrote:
$ prove -rb :: gargoyle :: --state=hot,save,all :: splendour :: t/
spog.t
Y'know, at some point I think I'll just write my own wrapper around
TAP::Harness, with attractive members of the appropriate gender, and
blackjack, and an amusement park.
That is, there *may* be a point here where cramming too much into
prove is
getting confusing. At some point, we all have to write some Perl.
The state stuff is useful I think. Passing args to tests is more
marginal and I certainly don't believe it's a big enough deal to
warrant the amount of debate it's attracted.
I'm going to go with '::'. If anyone dislikes it enough, as you say,
they can write their own tool.
--
Andy Armstrong, Hexten
