I would find something along those lines incredibly helpful. Most of our tests
have a variable number of tests based on a number of variables and so I use
no_plan and every single test. Being able to add to the plan within a block of
code would be massivley helpful and would allow us to be able to use a plan.
Eric Harrison
QA Developer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
w: www.rea-group.com
REA Group refers to realestate.com.au Ltd (ASX:REA)
This email transmission may contain confidential information. If you have
received this transmission in error, please notify us immediately on (61 3)
9897 1121 or reply by email to the sender. You must destroy the email
immediately and not use, copy, distribute or disclose the contents. Thank you.
-----Original Message-----
From: Eric Wilhelm [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, 4 December 2007 3:37 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Why not run a test without a plan?
# from David Golden
# on Monday 03 December 2007 19:55:
>With some sugar, that could actually be quite handy for something like
>test blocks. E.g.:
>
>{
> plan add => 2;
> ok( 1, "wibble" );
> ok(1, "wobble" );
>}
or maybe make the block a sub
block {
subplan 2;
ok(1, "wibble");
ok(1, "wobble");
};
The bit where prototypes "must have the & first" hurts, but then there's always
λ{}. :-D
--Eric
--
The reasonable man adapts himself to the world; the unreasonable man persists
in trying to adapt the world to himself. Therefore all progress depends on the
unreasonable man.
--George Bernard Shaw
---------------------------------------------------
http://scratchcomputing.com
---------------------------------------------------
